Using canonical transform to show area preserving

  • Thread starter Thread starter bagram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Transform
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a given Poincaré map is area-preserving for all values of r. The transformation involves a matrix that combines exponential scaling and rotation, but the presence of the nonlinear term I_n complicates the analysis. Participants suggest using the Jacobian of the transformation rather than simply calculating the determinant of the matrix to verify area preservation. The method involves computing partial derivatives, which is acknowledged to be tedious but necessary. Ultimately, the Jacobian approach is emphasized as the correct method to confirm the area-preserving property of the map.
bagram
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given a certain poincare map, show that it is area preserving for all values of r

Homework Equations


\binom{x_{n+1}}{y_{n+1}}=\begin{pmatrix}e^{r} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-r} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}cos(\phi+I_{n}) & -sin(\phi+I_{n}) \\ sin(\phi+I_{n}) & cos(\phi+I_{n}) \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}x_{n}\\ y_{n} \end{pmatrix}

where
I_{n}=x_{n}^2+y_{n}^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to prove that the determinant \binom{x_{n+1}}{y_{n+1}}=\begin{pmatrix}e^{r} & 0 \\ 0 & e^{-r} \end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}cos(\phi+I_{n}) & -sin(\phi+I_{n}) \\ sin(\phi+I_{n}) & cos(\phi+I_{n}) \end{pmatrix} is equal to 1, I believe that is wrong since the I in the matrix is X^2+Y^2, so I was wondering should i use the Poisson bracket method?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The presence of ##I_n## makes the map nonlinear, so you can't just look at the determinant of the map to see if it is area preserving.

Think of the map as being in the form $$x_{n+1} = f(x_n,y_n)$$ $$y_{n+1} = g(x_n,y_n)$$
Then consider the Jacobian of this transformation.
See for example http://www.math.harvard.edu/archive/118r_spring_05/handouts/henon.pdf
 
Ahhh okay, so then i just do the partial of each entry in the matrix to check if the det=1?
 
Yes. It's a little tedious.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K