Deriving the Relativistic Transverse Doppler Effect (Circular Motion)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the relativistic transverse Doppler effect in the context of circular motion, focusing on the transformations of four-velocities and four-momenta between inertial and rotating frames. Participants are exploring the implications of Lorentz transformations and the proper time in a rotating reference frame.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Lorentz transformations to the observer's four-velocity and the photon's four-momentum, questioning the correctness of their transformations and the resulting scalar products. There is an exploration of the relationship between different reference frames and the necessity of using consistent coordinate bases for calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints regarding the proper application of transformations, suggesting that the original poster may be misapplying the Lorentz transformation in part a. There is ongoing exploration of the implications of using different frames and the need for clarity in the mathematical setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with LaTeX formatting, which may affect the clarity of the mathematical expressions presented. There is also a mention of the need to adhere to specific instructions regarding the reference frames used in the problem.

stephenklein
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A circular disk of radius R rotates with angular velocity (##\Omega##). The center of the disk is
at rest in an inertial frame. Light of frequency (##\omega##) is radiated from a point source at the center of the disk. What is the frequency (##\omega '##) measured by an observer attached to the rim of the rotating disk? Solve this problem in three different ways:

(a) Use the fact that if a particle has four-momentum ##\bar{p} = (E, \vec p)## in an inertial frame O then the energy (E ') seen by an observer with four-velocity ##U_{obs}## is ##E' = -\bar{p} \cdot \bar{e_{t'}}##.

(b) Use the Lorentz transformation of components of the photon four-momentum.

(c) In the frame of the rotating disk the effect of the gravitational field is to blue-shift
the photon. (*Use the results of (c) in the Rotating Space Station probe question).

*The referenced question was to derive the proper time of an observer in the hull of a rotating space station, the answer given as ##\tau = \frac{t'}{\gamma (v)}##, where the relative velocity v is ##r\Omega##, the radial distance from the space station's axis of rotation times a constant angular speed ##\Omega##.
Relevant Equations
Energy of a particle according to any inertial observer:
$$E' = -\bar{p} \cdot \bar{U_{obs}}$$

Lorentz Transformation as a partial derivative:
$$\Lambda^{\alpha '}_{\alpha} = \frac{\partial x^{\alpha '}}{\partial x^{\alpha}} $$
Proper time for observer on the rim of the disk:
$$\tau = \frac{t'}{\gamma (v)} $$
**I realize some of my inline math delimiters '\(' and '\)' are not acting on the text for some reason, and it looks clunky. I spend 20-30 minutes trying to understand why this is, but I can't. My limited LaTeX experience is in Overleaf, and these delimiters work fine in that compiler. My apologies for the clunky format**
**Edit: Big thanks to Mark44 for the LaTeX help**

Part a:
Scalar products must happen using the same coordinate basis for each vector, so I should find ##\bar{e_{t'}}##, the rotating observer's four-velocity, in the coordinate basis of the center of the disk frame, which is the coordinate basis of the photon's four-momentum. In cylindrical coordinates, the frames are related by the following (these relations were given in the previous question on the assignment):
$$t'=t$$
$$r'=r$$
$$\phi ' = \phi - \omega t$$
$$z'=z$$
Apply the Lorentz transformation to the observer's four-velocity, ##\bar{e_{0'}}##, to get its components in the inertial frame:
$$\bar{U_{obs}}=\bar{e_{0'}}=\frac{\partial x^{\alpha}}{\partial x^{0'}} \bar{e_{\alpha}}$$
$$\bar{U_{obs}}= \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ \Omega\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}$$
Four-momentum, using natural units so c=1, is:
\begin{pmatrix} h\omega \\ h\omega \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}
From this, it's clear that the (negative) scalar product will just give me back the original energy, ##h\omega##, which I know is wrong. I'm guessing I'm going wrong with the Lorentz transformation, but that's exactly how the transformation works according to my notes.

Part b:
Well, the Lorentz transformation for the photon's four-momentum should be the inverse of the transformation I tried in part a. So, in the primed frame (the rotating one):
$$p^{\alpha '} = \frac{\partial x^{\alpha '}}{\partial x^{\alpha}} p^{\alpha}$$
$$p^{\alpha '} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & -\Omega & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ \frac{1}{\Omega} & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} h\omega \\ h\omega \\ 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}$$
$$p^{\alpha '} = \begin{pmatrix} h\omega \\ h\omega \\ \frac{h\omega}{\Omega} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}$$
Well, clearly something is wrong, because this is not a null vector. The components for the Lorentz matrix were obtained by applying partial derivatives to the coordinate relations, and substituting t=t' when finding the ##\Lambda^{2}_{0}## component:
$$t = \frac{\phi - \phi '}{\Omega}$$
$$t'= \frac{\phi - \phi '}{\Omega}$$
This answer, along with my answer for part a, seems to indicate I must be misunderstanding something regarding the transformations.

Part c:
Proper time in the rotating frame:
$$\tau = \frac{t}{\gamma}$$
So the frequency should be ##\frac{1}{\tau}##:
$$\omega ' = \frac{1}{\tau} = \frac{\gamma}{t}$$
Here, ##\gamma## is ##\sqrt{1-(\frac{r\Omega}{c})^{2}}##, and ##\frac{1}{t}## is the photon's frequency in the inertial frame. So, ##\omega '= \omega \sqrt{1-(\frac{r\Omega}{c})^{2}}##. I'm fairly confident this answer is actually right.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I know my LaTeX is not executing how it's supposed to. The code works fine in Overleaf, so I'm not sure where the issue is arising from. Hopefully it's clear what I'm asking.
 
Hint: in part a), you should not be using a Lorentz transform, nor any basis other than the inertial reference frame where the center remains stationary. The problem says as much, so follow directions.
 
Mentor note: I fixed as much of the LaTeX as I could, but there were two equations using bar that I wasn't able to fix. It's possible that there's a bug in our forum software for text in the Homework Statement and Relevant Equations sections.

Added: Take a look at our LaTeX tutorial. The delimiters here are pairs of ## characters (inline TeX) or $$ (standalone TeX) characters. Also, the site supports MathJax, which is slightly different from LaTeX itself.
 
Last edited:
Mark, thank you very much.

PAllen -- In my attempt, I was trying to perform the dot product in the basis of the inertial frame. But ##\bar{e_{t'}}## isn't given to me in that frame. However, I do know that ##\bar{e_{t'}}## in the rotating frame is just ##\bar{e_{0'}}##, so in order to obtain this vector in the inertial frame, don't I need a transformation? Otherwise, without a transformation, my dot product becomes:
$$-(-1 \cdot h\omega+0 \cdot h\omega+0 \cdot 0+0 \cdot 0)$$
Which just spits out ##h\omega##, the energy of the photon according to the inertial observer, which I already knew, and doesn't tell me the energy of the photon in the rotating frame.

For scalar products to remain invariant, don't the vectors in question need to be expressed in the same frame first?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K