Using Classification of Poles to Calculate Residues

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shen07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classification Poles
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of poles in complex analysis, specifically focusing on how to calculate residues for simple and multiple poles using two different types of formulations. Participants explore the conditions under which each type should be applied and the implications of their choices.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe two types of classifications for simple poles: Type 1 involves a function expressed as \( f(z)=(z-a)^{-1}g(z) \) and Type 2 as \( f(z)=\frac{h(z)}{k(z)} \), with specific conditions for each.
  • There is a question about how to determine when to use Type 1 versus Type 2, with some suggesting that Type 2 is a more general formulation.
  • One participant proposes that using Type 2 can simplify calculations in certain cases, such as when dealing with specific functions.
  • Another participant mentions that Type 1 can be derived from Type 2 by letting \( k(z) = z-a \), but emphasizes that \( h(z) \) must be holomorphic near \( a \).
  • Discussion includes examples of functions where either type could be used, highlighting the ease of computation as a deciding factor.
  • For multiple poles, participants present similar classifications and question when to use each type, noting that the choice may depend on the ease of expanding the function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the conditions for using Type 1 and Type 2, with no consensus reached on a definitive guideline for when to apply each type. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity of certain conditions in Type 2.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the classification and application of residues depend on the specific functions being analyzed and the context of the problem, which may introduce limitations in generalizing the rules.

shen07
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi guys i wanted to clear out some confusion, Suppose $\text{z=a}$ is a simple pole, my Professor classify it as follows:

Simple Pole at z=a

Type 1: $$f(z)=(z-a)^{-1}g(z),g\in H(D(a;r)):$$

$$Res\{f(z);a\}=g(a)$$​

Type 2: $$f(z)=\frac{h(z)}{k(z)},h(a)\neq 0,k(a)=0,k^{'}(a)\neq 0:$$
$$Res\{f(z);a\}=\frac{h(a)}{k^{'}(a)}$$​

Now my question is how do i know when should i use the Type 1 or Type 2??

Please Help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shen07 said:
Hi guys i wanted to clear out some confusion, Suppose $\text{z=a}$ is a simple pole, my Professor classify it as follows:

Simple Pole at z=a

Type 1: $$f(z)=(z-a)^{-1}g(z),g\in H(D(a;r)):$$

$$Res\{f(z);a\}=g(a)$$​

Type 2: $$f(z)=\frac{h(z)}{k(z)},h(a)\neq 0,k(a)=0,k^{'}(a)\neq 0:$$
$$Res\{f(z);a\}=\frac{h(a)}{k^{'}(a)}$$​

Now my question is how do i know when should i use the Type 1 or Type 2??

Please Help

Suppose you pick $k(z)=z-a$ in Type 2.
Which residue do you get?
Recognize it?
 
shen07 said:
$$\cdots , g\in H(D(a;r)):$$

May I ask what do you mean by that ?
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
May I ask what do you mean by that ?
Hi Zaid, its a notation: g is holomorphic(H) in the Disc center a,radius r

- - - Updated - - -

I like Serena said:
Suppose you pick $k(z)=z-a$ in Type 2.
Which residue do you get?
Recognize it?

What you mean to say is that, both are the same?? bt in what case should we use each type?
 
shen07 said:
What you mean to say is that, both are the same?? bt in what case should we use each type?

Type 2 is a more general formulation of the same thing.
Use whatever is easiest for the problem at hand.

Although I do not think that $h(a) \ne 0$ is a necessary precondition to use type 2.
It should suffice that h(a) exists.
 
Type 1 is a special case of Type 2 by letting $$k(z) = z-a $$ . Of course we must have that $$h(z) $$ is holomorphic in a neighborhood of $$a$$.

Assume that $$z=a$$ is a simple pole of order $1$ then we can have

$$f(z) = \frac{g(z)}{z-a}$$

Then the residue at $$z=a$$ is $$f(z) = \frac{g(a)}{(z-a)'}=g(a)$$

If $$f(z) = \frac{h(z)}{k(z)}$$ where $$h(z)$$ has a simple zero of order $$1$$ at $$z=a$$ then

$$\text{Res}(f(z);a) = \lim_{z \to a}(z-a) \frac{h(z)}{k(z)-k(a)}=\lim_{z \to a} \frac{h(z)}{\frac{k(z)-k(a)}{z-a}}=\frac{h(a)}{k'(a)}$$
 
Suppose i have like a function

$$f(z)=\frac{(z-i)^2}{(z^3+1)}$$

then using Type 2 is much easier here than using Type 1, $$Res\{f(z);-1\}=\frac{h(-1)}{k^{'}(-1)},\text{ where }h(z)=(z-i)^{2}\text{ & }k(z)=z^{3}+1$$

Using type 1 would complicate things,Right??
 
You could use Type 1 by factorization

$$z^3+1= (z+1)(z^2-z+1)$$

It won't be complicated.
 
What about the Residues of Multiple Poles:

Multiple pole at z=a order m

Type 1:
$$f(z)=(z-a)^{m}g(z),g \in H(D(a;r)):$$
$$\text{Res}\{f(z);a\}=\frac{g^{m-1}(a)}{(m-1)!}$$

Type 2:
$$\text{Res}\{f(z);a\}=\text{Coefficient }C_{-1}\text{ of }\frac{1}{z-a}$$
in the Laurent expansion of f(z) about z=a

When to use each type??
 
  • #10
For example :

$$f(z) = \frac{\cos(z)}{z^3}$$ then you have two choices and that depends on the easieness of expanding the function .

Since we know that $$\cos(z) = 1-\frac{z^2}{2!}+\frac{z^4}{4!}+\cdots $$

Then the Laurent expansion of the function around $$z=0$$ will be

$$f(z) = \frac{ 1-\frac{z^2}{2!}+\frac{z^4}{4!}+\cdots }{z^3}=\frac{1}{z^3}-\frac{1}{2! \, z}+\frac{1}{4!}\, z+\cdots $$

Clearly the residue will be $$\frac{-1}{2!}$$

To use Type 1 we use the formula which is easy since $$\cos^{(2)}(z) = -\cos(z) $$ so the residue will be $$-\frac{1}{2!} \cos(0) = \frac{-1}{2!}$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K