Using conservation of energy to find spring constant but off number

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the spring constant for a .60 kg metal sphere oscillating on a vertical spring, with the spring stretching from .12 m to .23 m. The user initially calculated the spring constant as 114 N/m, while suggesting it should be 180 N/m. The calculations involve changes in gravitational potential energy and spring potential energy as the sphere's speed decreases from 5.7 m/s to 4.80 m/s during the spring's extension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts of oscillation
  • Ability to perform energy conservation calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Hooke's Law and its applications
  • Learn how to calculate gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy
  • Explore energy conservation principles in oscillatory motion
  • Investigate the effects of mass and spring constant on oscillation frequency
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding spring dynamics and energy conservation principles in mechanical systems.

slambert56
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Okay so I think the answer should be 180N/m unless the book is wrong and I got 114N/m. Now if there is a mistake in my work shown in the picture it would have to be the height final or height initial. I am going with height inital is the x initial and the height final equals the x final.(I think this is correct)

question; a .60kg metal sphere oscillates at the end of a vertical spring. as the spring stretches from .12 to .23m(relative to its unstrained length) the speed of the sphere decreases from 5.7 to 4.80m/s. what is the spring constant of the spring?
http://img231.imageshack.us/img231/8118/001ql.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
sorry for the work on the back that you can see. any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
As the spring stretches, the mass is at a lesser height, therefore has less gravitational potential energy, but more potential energy due to the spring.

You could consider the height to be -x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K