Using e to determine population growth?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating population growth using the exponential growth formula Q(time) = Q(initial) * e^(rate * time) versus a discrete doubling model. The population, starting at 10,000 in 1900 and doubling every 50 years, results in 40,000 by 2000 using the formula Q = 10,000 * (2)^(x/50). The exponential formula is deemed unsuitable for this problem due to its continuous growth assumption, which does not accurately represent the discrete nature of the population doubling every 50 years.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential growth equations
  • Knowledge of discrete versus continuous growth models
  • Familiarity with natural logarithms and their properties
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about discrete growth models in population dynamics
  • Study the derivation of the exponential growth formula
  • Explore the implications of using continuous models for discrete phenomena
  • Investigate the application of natural logarithms in growth rate calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mathematics or biology, educators teaching population dynamics, and anyone interested in understanding the differences between discrete and continuous growth models.

moonman239
Messages
276
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A population started at 10,000 in 1900. The population doubles every 50 years. What was the population in 2000?


Homework Equations



Q(time) = Q(initial)*e(rate)(time)

The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to come up with the answer using the standard growth equation, but got the wrong answer with the given equation. Am I doing anything wrong or is the equation not suitable for this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moonman239 said:

Homework Statement



A population started at 10,000 in 1900. The population doubles every 50 years. What was the population in 2000?


Homework Equations



Q(time) = Q(initial)*e(rate)(time)

The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to come up with the answer using the standard growth equation, but got the wrong answer with the given equation. Am I doing anything wrong or is the equation not suitable for this problem?

I don't think you're supposed to use the exponential equation. If the population was 10,000 in 1900 and it doubles every 50 years, what was it in 1950? (No calculator allowed:-p)
What was it in 2000?
 
I wouldn't use e. you could simply use. Q=10000(2)^(x/50)
 
In fact, because 2000= 1900+ 50+ 50, no "formula" is necessary. In 50 years the population doubles. If it was 10000 in 1900, what was it in 1950, 50 years later? What was it in 2000, another 50 years later?

(Should have read the other posts more carefully. I see now that Mark44 already said that.)

If you really want to use the exponential formula you give, you have to be determine what "rate" is. Since the population doubles in 50 years, you must have e^{(rate)(50)}= 2 so that (rate)(50)= ln(2) and rate= ln(2)/50. The population after t years is 10000e^{ln(2)t/50}.

Note that this us the same as 10000(e^{ln(2)})^{t/50} and since e^{ln(2)}= 2 that is the same as 10000(2^{t/50}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
moonman239 said:

Homework Statement



A population started at 10,000 in 1900. The population doubles every 50 years. What was the population in 2000?


Homework Equations



Q(time) = Q(initial)*e(rate)(time)

The Attempt at a Solution


I was able to come up with the answer using the standard growth equation, but got the wrong answer with the given equation. Am I doing anything wrong or is the equation not suitable for this problem?

e is not involved. e is only involved during continuous growth.
 
It is very common to approximate discrete changes with continuous models.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It is very common to approximate discrete changes with continuous models.

But in this case the approximation is innaccurate. It is also harder, when one can just multiply by ##2^n##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K