Using energy considerations to analyse particle motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing particle motion using energy considerations, specifically focusing on kinetic and potential energy relationships as the particle approaches the origin.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish a relationship between kinetic and potential energy to determine the conditions under which a particle can cross the origin. Some participants question the initial approach of using KE-PE instead of KE+PE, leading to further exploration of energy conservation principles.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants raising questions about the assumptions made in the original poster's approach. There is an ongoing examination of the energy conservation concept, particularly regarding the conditions necessary for the particle to pass through the origin.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential confusion regarding the application of energy conservation in this context, particularly in relation to the definitions of kinetic and potential energy at specific points.

I_Try_Math
Messages
119
Reaction score
25
Homework Statement
(a) Sketch a graph of the potential energy function ## U(x) = \frac {kx^2} {2} + Ae^{-\alpha x^2} ## where k, A, and, ##\alpha## are constants. (b) What is the force corresponding to this potential energy? (c) Suppose a particle of mass m moving with this potential energy has a velocity ##v_a## when its position is x=a. Show that the particle does not pass through the origin unless ## A \leq \frac {mv^2_a + ka^2} {2(1 - e^{-\alpha a^2})} ##
Relevant Equations
## U(x) = \frac {kx^2} {2} + Ae^{-\alpha x^2} ##
For part (c) my understanding is that in this case for the particle to cross the origin it must have at least as much kinetic energy as there is potential energy at ##U(0) = A##. Given the potential energy and kinetic energy at any position x=a is equal to ## U(a) = \frac {ka^2} {2} + Ae^{-\alpha a^2} ## and ## \frac 1 2mv^2_a ## respectively, this implies that:



##A \leq \frac 1 2mv^2_a - \frac {ka^2} {2} - Ae^{-\alpha a^2} ##

##A + Ae^{-\alpha a^2} \leq \frac 1 2mv^2_a - \frac {ka^2} {2} ##

##A(1 + e^{-\alpha a^2}) \leq \frac 1 2(mv^2_a - ka^2) ##

##2A(1 + e^{-\alpha a^2}) \leq mv^2_a - ka^2)##

##A \leq \frac {mv^2_a - ka^2} {2(1 + e^{-\alpha a^2})}##

Can't tell where I'm making a mistake.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you start with KE-PE rather than KE+PE?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
Hill said:
Why do you start with KE-PE rather than KE+PE?
I guess I'm just getting confused. So supposing the particle goes through the origin, ##KE + PE \gt A##, correct?
 
I_Try_Math said:
I guess I'm just getting confused. So supposing the particle goes through the origin, ##KE + PE \gt A##, correct?
The total energy is conserved: ##KE(a)+PE(a)=KE(0)+PE(0)=KE(0)+A##
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: I_Try_Math

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K