Using Energy to Solve Work Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving a truck traveling down a hill at 11.1 m/s with locked brakes. The hill's angle is 15.0°, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.750. The correct distance the truck travels before stopping is determined to be 13.5 meters, after correcting the initial calculations that mistakenly used the wrong angle in the work equation. Key equations include the work-energy principle and the relationship between kinetic and potential energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the work-energy principle in physics
  • Knowledge of kinetic friction and its calculation (μk)
  • Familiarity with gravitational potential energy equations
  • Ability to manipulate trigonometric functions in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem and its applications in mechanics
  • Learn about the effects of friction on motion in inclined planes
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy in dynamic systems
  • Practice solving problems involving trigonometric relationships in physics contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and energy concepts, as well as educators looking for problem-solving strategies in teaching these topics.

murrskeez
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A truck is traveling at 11.1 m/s down a hill when the brakes on all four wheels lock. The hill makes an angle of 15.0° with respect to the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the road is 0.750. How far does the truck travel before coming to a stop? Use energy to solve this problem.

Homework Equations



fk = Ef - Ei
fk = μk*FN
FN=mgcos15°

The Attempt at a Solution



First, I found the work done by the friction force: Wfk = S(μkFN)cos180°
Wfk = μk(mgcos15°)(-1)

Then I solved for the work done by friction using the energy equation:
W = 1/2(mv2) +mgy - 1/2(mvi2) -mgyi
W = 0 + mgy - 1/2(mvi2) - 0

then I set the two equations equal to one another:
μk(mgcos15°)(-1) = mgy - 1/2(mvi2)

the m's canceled out and I solved for y:

y = μk(gcos15°)(-1) + 1/2(vi2) / g

and plugged in values:

y = (0.750)(9.8m/s2)(cos15°)(-1) + 1/2(11.0)2 / 9.8m/s2

and got: y = 6.90 m

knowing that the truck was traveling at 15°, sin15° = y/s
s = 6.90/sin15°
s = 26.7m

the correct answer should be 13.5m. Any help/advice would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
murrskeez said:

Homework Statement



A truck is traveling at 11.1 m/s down a hill when the brakes on all four wheels lock. The hill makes an angle of 15.0° with respect to the horizontal. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the tires and the road is 0.750. How far does the truck travel before coming to a stop? Use energy to solve this problem.



Homework Equations



fk = Ef - Ei
fk = μk*FN
FN=mgcos15°


The Attempt at a Solution



First, I found the work done by the friction force: Wfk = S(μkFN)cos180°
Wfk = μk(mgcos15°)(-1)

Then I solved for the work done by friction using the energy equation:
W = 1/2(mv2) +mgy - 1/2(mvi2) -mgyi
W = 0 + mgy - 1/2(mvi2) - 0

then I set the two equations equal to one another:
μk(mgcos15°)(-1) = mgy - 1/2(mvi2)

the m's canceled out and I solved for y:

y = μk(gcos15°)(-1) + 1/2(vi2) / g

and plugged in values:

y = (0.750)(9.8m/s2)(cos15°)(-1) + 1/2(11.0)2 / 9.8m/s2

and got: y = 6.90 m

knowing that the truck was traveling at 15°, sin15° = y/s
s = 6.90/sin15°
s = 26.7m

the correct answer should be 13.5m. Any help/advice would be much appreciated.

Should that 180° angle you used have actually been 15° ?
 
I thought that the in the formula W = sfcos∅ , the angle ∅ should represent the angle between the direction of s and the corresponding force, which in this case would be friction...and those two directions are 180° apart, right?
 
Where did s go in your Wfk equation? Also, what is the first equation in the relevant equations section? Don't use y in your potential energy equation, write in terms of s.
 
frogjg2003 said:
Where did s go in your Wfk equation? Also, what is the first equation in the relevant equations section? Don't use y in your potential energy equation, write in terms of s.

Oops, looks like I dropped the s. Looks like that would make

y = sμk(gcos15°)(-1) + 1/2(11.0)2 / 9.8 m/s2

could I then relate s and y through sin? Am I even on the right track?

The first equation is Wother = ΔE , other in this case meaning friction. Was given to me by my professor. But s and y are representing two different things, and y is a reflection of the incorporation of gravitational potential energy into the problem so I don't see how I can get around using it?
 
Go back a step or two and write out the Wfk=ΔKE+ΔPE equation. Don't use y, use s and θ. Also, keep a close eye on the signs. s is downwards, but both ΔEs should be negative.
 
frogjg2003 said:
Go back a step or two and write out the Wfk=ΔKE+ΔPE equation. Don't use y, use s and θ. Also, keep a close eye on the signs. s is downwards, but both ΔEs should be negative.

Finally got the correct answer, thank you very very much :smile:
 
You're welcome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
938
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K