MHB Using Log Laws and values to compute this compution

  • Thread starter Thread starter cbarker1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Log
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Using logs to compute the following, to the four-figure accuracy. $\frac{.009292}{(\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23)}$

Let N=$\frac{.009292}{(\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23)}$, then
$\log\left({N}\right)=\log\left({\frac{.009292}{(\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23)}
}\right)$.

Log N=

$\log\left({.09292}\right)-\log\left({\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23}\right)$

What to do with the logarithm after the subtraction sign?the answer in the back of the book is 9.507*10^(-4)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Cbarker1 said:
Using logs to compute the following, to the four-figure accuracy. $\frac{.009292}{(\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23)}$

Let N=$\frac{.009292}{(\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23)}$, then
$\log\left({N}\right)=\log\left({\frac{.009292}{(\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23)}
}\right)$.

Log N=

$\log\left({.09292}\right)-\log\left({\sqrt[3]{582400}+14.23}\right)$

What to do with the logarithm after the subtraction sign?

You might substitute:
$$\sqrt[3]{582400} = 10^{\log(\sqrt[3]{582400})} = 10^{\frac 1 3 \log 582400}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top