Using Orbital Energy to Calculate Velocity

  • #1
JoeyBob
256
29
Homework Statement:
See attached picture
Relevant Equations:
change Ek + change Ep =0, Ek=1/2mv^2, Ep=-GMm/r
So what I did first was calculate the initial and final potential energies with Epi=-9.433*10^11 m and Epf = -1.503*10^12 m.

Then I found change in potential energy, -5.597*10^11 m.

Using this I determined the change in kinetic energy, 5.597*10^11. I then added this change to the initial kinetic energy I calculated (103.68 m) to get a final Ek of 5.597*10^11 m.

Then I calculated the final velocity, Ekm=v^2*0.5, finding that v=1058017, which is obviously way higher than the right answer.

Where am I going wrong here? Is there some non conservative work or something?
 

Attachments

  • Question.PNG
    Question.PNG
    12.9 KB · Views: 75

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
39,566
8,830
Homework Statement:: See attached picture
Relevant Equations:: change Ek + change Ep =0, Ek=1/2mv^2, Ep=-GMm/r

So what I did first was calculate the initial and final potential energies with Epi=-9.433*10^11 m and Epf = -1.503*10^12 m.

Then I found change in potential energy, -5.597*10^11 m.

Using this I determined the change in kinetic energy, 5.597*10^11. I then added this change to the initial kinetic energy I calculated (103.68 m) to get a final Ek of 5.597*10^11 m.

Then I calculated the final velocity, Ekm=v^2*0.5, finding that v=1058017, which is obviously way higher than the right answer.

Where am I going wrong here? Is there some non conservative work or something?
Please post all your working, just as algebra, no plugged in values. This will make it much easier to see where the mistake is, unless it is purely arithmetic, which is unlikely.
 
  • #3
mjc123
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,294
699
Your units are all over the place. Plugging in r in km and v in km/s means you get ΔEp = -5.597*1011m mJ and Eki = 103.68m MJ. (I haven't checked the calculations, but the numbers look in the right ballpark.) It is much better to convert everything to SI units (and back at the end if necessary), and INCLUDE THE UNITS AT EACH STAGE OF THE CALCULATION. Can never stress too much the importance of units.
 
  • #4
kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
12,824
6,012
Homework Statement:: See attached picture
Relevant Equations:: change Ek + change Ep =0, Ek=1/2mv^2, Ep=-GMm/r

Where am I going wrong here? Is there some non conservative work or something?
Your change in potential energy is 103 times too high. What does this suggest to you?

On edit: I am questioning the validity of this problem. The perigee speed ##v_p##, obtained from the given parameters using energy conservation, is inconsistent with conservation of angular momentum. Angular momentum conservation (per unit mass) requires that ##v_1 r_1\sin\theta=v_p r_p##. Solving for ##\sin\theta## returns a value greater than 1 which is impossible if my calculation is correct.
 
Last edited:

Suggested for: Using Orbital Energy to Calculate Velocity

Replies
14
Views
291
Replies
3
Views
524
Replies
3
Views
470
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
509
Replies
6
Views
576
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
525
Top