Using Residues (Complex Analysis) to compute partial fractions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on computing the partial fraction decomposition of the rational function f(z) = (z + 2) / ((z + 1)^2(z^2 + 1)) using residue theory in complex analysis. The participants clarify the calculation of residues at multiple roots, specifically at z = -1, and how to derive constants A_1, A_2, B_1, and B_2. The residue at a double pole is computed using the general formula for residues of nth-order poles, emphasizing that a function has only one residue at a root of its denominator, regardless of multiplicity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Understanding of residue theory
  • Knowledge of partial fraction decomposition
  • Familiarity with Laurent series
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the general formula for residues of nth-order poles in complex analysis
  • Learn how to compute Laurent series expansions around singular points
  • Explore examples of partial fraction decomposition involving multiple roots
  • Investigate the relationship between residues and Taylor series expansions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those specializing in complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in advanced techniques for evaluating rational functions and their decompositions.

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
TL;DR
How to compute partial fractions decompose when one the factors is a root of multiplicity in the residue method?
Dear Everybody, I am wondering how to compute the partial fraction decomposition of the following rational function: ##f(z)=\frac{z+2}{(z+1)^2(z^2+1)}.##

I understand how to do the simple poles of the function and how it is related to the decomposition's constants, i.e. ##f(z)=\frac{A_1}{z+i}+\frac{A_2}{z-i}+\frac{B_1}{z+1}+\frac{B_2}{(z+1)^2}##. Thus, I know that ##A_1=-\frac{i+2}{4}## and ##A_2=-\frac{-i+2}{4}.## But how do I computes double pole in terms of the residue, if possible? How I can write out ##B_1, B_2.##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Setting z = 0 gives <br /> 2 = i(A_2 - A_1) + B_1 + B_2. Setting z = 1 gives <br /> \frac 38 = \frac{A_1 + A_2 + i(A_2-A_1)}{2} + \frac {B_1}2 + \frac{B_2}4. Once A_1 and A_2 are known, this system can be solved for B_1 and B_2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cbarker1
pasmith said:
Setting z = 0 gives <br /> 2 = i(A_2 - A_1) + B_1 + B_2. Setting z = 1 gives <br /> \frac 38 = \frac{A_1 + A_2 + i(A_2-A_1)}{2} + \frac {B_1}2 + \frac{B_2}4. Once A_1 and A_2 are known, this system can be solved for B_1 and B_2.

ok. thanks for your input. But, I think you may not answer my question because I am wondering how to do the partial fraction decomposition with respect to residue theory in complex analysis the multiple roots case?
 
For ##B_2##, define

\begin{align*}
g(z) = (z+1) f(z)
\end{align*}

Then

\begin{align*}
\text{Res} [g(z_0=-1)] = \text{Res} [\frac{B_2}{z+1}] = B_2
\end{align*}

You understand why:

\begin{align*}
\text{Res} [f(z_0=-1)] = \text{Res} [\frac{B_1}{z+1}] = B_1 ?
\end{align*}

where you would use the general formula for the residue of an ##nth-##order pole

\begin{align*}
\text{Res} [f(z_0)] = \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \lim_{z \rightarrow z_0} \left( \dfrac{d^{n-1}}{dz^{n-1}} [(z-z_0)^n f(z)] \right) .
\end{align*}

Are you sure your answers to ##A_1## and ##A_2## are right? So you are equating

\begin{align*}
\text{Res} [f(z_0=-i)] = \text{Res} [\frac{A_1}{z+i}] = A_1
\end{align*}

and then using

\begin{align*}
\text{Res} [f(z_0=-i)] = \lim_{z \rightarrow -i} [(z+i) f(z)]
\end{align*}

but I get ##A_1 = - \dfrac{-i+2}{4}##.
 
Last edited:
cbarker1 said:
ok. thanks for your input. But, I think you may not answer my question because I am wondering how to do the partial fraction decomposition with respect to residue theory in complex analysis the multiple roots case?

I was led astray by your statement <br /> f(z) = \frac{A_1}{z + i} + \frac{A_2}{z-i} + \frac{B_1}{z+1} + \frac{B_2}{(z + 1)^2} and therefore assumed you meant a partial fraction decomposition. But you meant to calculate the residue of f at -1 instead. A function has only one residue at a root of its denominator, regardless of the multiplicity of that root.

But to compute the Laurent series of f about -1 is fairly straightforward, if you do not know the formula quoted by @julian: <br /> \begin{split}<br /> f(z) &amp;= \frac{z + 2}{(z+1)^2(z^2+1)} \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{(z + 1) + 1}{(z+1)^2(z^2+1)} \\<br /> &amp;=\frac{1}{z^2 + 1}\left(\frac1{(z+1)} + \frac{1}{(z+1)^2}\right).<br /> \end{split} The common factor g(z) = (z^2 + 1)^{-1} is analytic at z = -1, so it has a Taylor series which converges in some open neighbourhood of it. So \begin{split}<br /> f(z) &amp;= \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{g^{(n)}(-1)(z + 1)^n}{n!}\left(\frac1{(z+1)} + \frac{1}{(z+1)^2}\right) \\<br /> &amp;= \frac{g(-1)}{(z + 1)^2} + \sum_{n=-1}^\infty\left(\frac{g^{(n+1)}(-1)}{(n+1)!} + <br /> \frac{g^{(n+2)}(-1)}{(n+2)!}\right)(z + 1)^n <br /> \end{split} and the residue is g(-1) + g&#039;(-1).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K