Using the greenhouse effect for energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of inducing a runaway greenhouse effect in a controlled environment for energy production. Participants explore the theoretical and practical implications of such an approach, comparing it to existing renewable energy methods like solar panels and solar-thermal systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the possibility of inducing a runaway greenhouse effect for energy production and asks why it is not currently implemented.
  • Another participant argues that energy is required to create a greenhouse effect, suggesting a fundamental flaw in the initial premise.
  • A third participant mentions a specific project related to harnessing solar energy but expresses skepticism about its viability, indicating that the basic concept may be sound despite concerns about construction and economics.
  • One participant clarifies their idea, proposing that a controlled environment could generate heat and pressure to drive a turbine for electricity generation, powered by sunlight.
  • Another participant counters that the energy available would be limited to the sunlight hitting the greenhouse, suggesting direct heating of water might be more efficient.
  • Some participants propose that while the greenhouse concept may not be beneficial, solar-thermal energy systems could be a viable alternative for generating heat and electricity.
  • A participant mentions the concept of a "greenhouse pot" used in solar cooking, which could potentially be adapted for boiling water and generating electricity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the practicality and efficiency of using a runaway greenhouse effect for energy production. There is no consensus on whether this approach is viable compared to existing renewable energy technologies.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the efficiency of energy capture and the economic viability of proposed methods, but these aspects remain unresolved within the discussion.

MR GREY
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Ok I don’t really know any reasons why this doesn’t happen already so I’m hoping some people can help.

Is it not possible to induce a Runaway greenhouse effect in a controlled environment and then use it for energy production?

If it is possible why isn’t it being done (too inefficient, costly etc)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That doesn't really make sense, since you need energy to create a greenhouse effect.
 
Sorry everybody, I can see why my question was unclear.

The enviromission project isn’t what I had in mind but thanks for suggesting it.

Just to explain it better:

So in a normal power station a turbine is turned using water or steam to generate electricity.

If you managed to create a clear box containing the stuff you need for a runaway greenhouse effect then the inside of the box would have a lot of heat and pressure. Surely that kind of environment could be used to pump water in, evaporate it, turn a turbine and generate electricity?

The energy to keep the greenhouse effect going would come from the sun.

Would this be more efficient than solar panels and other forms of renewable energy?
 
The energy coming into the greenhouse will still be proportional to the area of the greenhouse, so the average power available is still only the power of the sunlight hitting the box.
This leads me to think that you'd be better off simply heating the water directly with sunlight.
Perhaps you could use the greenhouse box to store energy, but there are more efficient and compact means to do so (such as liquid salt and batteries).
 
Thanks for that. You both explained it perfectly.
 
Solar cooking usually involves both concentrating the sunlight and also using a "greenhouse pot". The greenhouse pot is a dark pot inside a clear pot. It absorbs the sunlight and gets very hot. You could use this to boil water and generate electricity, I suppose.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K