MHB Using the idea of conservation of energy

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everybody

There is a ball which has mass of 11 grams is thrown straight up with an initial speed of 4 m/s. Assume the air drag is negligible.

a. What is the kinetic energy of the ball (in J) as it leaves the hand? b. How much work is done by the gravitational force during the ball's rise to its zenith? c. What's the change in the gravitational potential energy of the ball during the ball's rise to its zenith? d. If the grav. force is taken zero at the pt. where it leaves your hands, what's the grav. pot. energy when it reaches the max. height? e. If the grav. force is taken zero at the pt. where it leaves your hands, what would the grav. pot. energy when it reaches the max. height? f. What is the max height the ball reaches? The work:

The known values
mass is 11 grams
The initial velocity is 4m/s
The final velocity is 0
the value of gravity is 9.81m/s*s

a. I need to convert grams to kilograms. 11 grams to .011 kg. Then use kinetic energy which $K=(mv^2)/2$.
the answer is .088J.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, kinetic energy is "(1/2)mv^2". If you want the energy in Joules, you want the mass in kg and speed in m/s.

11 g grams is 11/1000= 0.011 kg. At the moment the ball is thrown up v is 4 m/s so the kinetic energy is (1/2)(0.011)(4^2)= 0.088 J


At the "zenith", the speed is 0 so there is no kinetic energy. "Using the idea of conservation of energy", that means that the increase in potential energy must be that same 0.088 J. The "work done" on the ball by the force of gravity is -0.088 J because that is how much its kinetic energy decreased. You say "If the grav. force is taken zero at the pt. where it leaves your hands" but you must mean "if the grav. potential energy is taken zero"- the force is always -mg, not 0. If the potential energy is, to start, 0 an increases by 0.088 J, as above, then it has increased to 0.088 J.

Your "e" is exactly the same as "d"? Did you miscopy?

To find the maximum height, set mh= 0.088. h= 0.088/0.011= 1 m. That will be, of course, 1 meter above the point at which it is released.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top