Using the residue theorem to evaluate a real integral.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral from 0 to infinity of the function x²/[(x²+9)(x²+4)²] using the residue theorem. The user identified poles at ±3i and ±2i, with only 3i and 2i lying within the chosen contour of a semi-circle of radius R>3 in the upper half-plane. After calculating the residues and confirming them with Wolfram Alpha, the user arrived at a final answer of π/100, while Wolfram provided π/200. The discrepancy arose from the realization that the integral of an even function requires halving the result of the integral over the entire real line.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis and the residue theorem
  • Familiarity with contour integration techniques
  • Knowledge of evaluating integrals involving complex functions
  • Experience with using computational tools like Wolfram Alpha for verification
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of even and odd functions in integral calculus
  • Learn more about contour integration in complex analysis
  • Explore the residue theorem applications in evaluating improper integrals
  • Practice solving integrals using computational tools like Wolfram Alpha
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone interested in advanced techniques for evaluating integrals.

jrp131191
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am trying to evaluate the integral from 0 to infinity of x^2/[(x^2+9)(x^2+4)^2 dx
(really really sorry, I don't know how to use latex yet but as of today I will begin learning!)

I chose to evaluate it around a semi-circle of radius R, R>3 (y>0 quadrants) and have found that there are poles at +/-3i and +/-2i. Though only two poles, 3i and 2i lie inside my contour.

I've calculated the residues and confirmed that they are indeed correct with wolfram. I suspect I'm doing something wrong with my region of integration since the integration limits are from 0-->infinity I may have chosen a stupid contour?

My final answer is pi/100 whereas wolfram calculates pi/200..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I think I figured it out.. I'm integrating an even function so if my integral is I(z) then I(z)=(1/2)J(z) where J(z) is the integral from -inf to inf... and I've actually integrated J(z) correct? I've just kind of read this off an example I've seen so If anyone can explain to me what was wrong it would be much appreciated.
 
The latex would be:

I am trying to evaluate the integral \int_0^\infty \frac{x^2}{(x^2+9)(x^2 + 4)} dx

I evaluated it around a semi-circle of radius R, R>3 in the y>0 quadrants. There are poles at \pm -3i and \pm+/-2i. Onlly two poles, 3i and 2i lie inside my contour.

I calculated the residues and confirmed that they are correct with Wolfram. My integration limits are from 0 to \infty. Did I chosen a stupid contour?

My final answer is \frac{\pi}{100} whereas Wolfram calculates \frac{\pi}{200}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K