UV Galaxy Surface brightness says no expansion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the debate surrounding Eric J. Lerner's paper, which presents evidence suggesting a non-expanding universe model, contradicting the widely accepted Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) model. Key points include the examination of redshift phenomena, Tolman’s surface brightness test, and the implications of various observational anomalies, such as those cataloged by Halton Arp. Participants express skepticism towards Lerner's claims while acknowledging the need for further investigation into redshift and surface brightness relationships, emphasizing the importance of rigorous scientific scrutiny.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmological models
  • Familiarity with redshift phenomena and its implications in cosmology
  • Knowledge of Tolman’s surface brightness test
  • Awareness of observational astronomy techniques and data analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Eric J. Lerner's paper on non-expanding universe evidence
  • Study the implications of Tolman’s surface brightness test in detail
  • Investigate Halton Arp's catalog of discordant redshift associations
  • Explore recent research on redshift anomalies and their interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers interested in the fundamental questions of cosmic expansion and redshift phenomena will benefit from this discussion.

  • #31
I dont' see the point in talking about what happened to photons before the last surface of scattering of CMB photons. They have no effect on CMBR studies, aside from contributing to the power spectrum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
26K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K