Vacuum Energy - Pair Production Confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the complexities of black hole evaporation and vacuum energy, particularly focusing on the role of virtual particles and pair production. Participants clarify that while both particles in a pair created by vacuum fluctuations locally carry positive energy, one may appear to have negative energy at infinity, contributing to the phenomenon of Hawking radiation. The conversation also touches on the implications of virtual particles in quantum field theory (QFT) and their relevance to high-energy physics, emphasizing that they are not mere artifacts but crucial for understanding fundamental processes like annihilation and energy conservation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole thermodynamics and Hawking radiation
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT) concepts
  • Knowledge of vacuum fluctuations and pair production
  • Basic grasp of energy conservation principles in particle physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Hawking radiation on black hole thermodynamics
  • Study the role of virtual particles in quantum field theory
  • Explore the concept of vacuum energy and its relationship to dark energy
  • Investigate the Casimir effect and its connection to virtual particles
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, cosmologists, and students of theoretical physics seeking to deepen their understanding of black hole dynamics, quantum field theory, and the nature of vacuum energy.

  • #31
malawi_glenn said:
...
Well this may be confusing. The definition of the vacuum to start with is the state with the lowest possible energy, and only energy differences matter : at this point with do not need perturbative methods. I think it is worth emphasizing before embarking into perturbative calculations of the energy of the fluctuations.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
humanino said:
Well this may be confusing. The definition of the vacuum to start with is the state with the lowest possible energy, and only energy differences matter : at this point with do not need perturbative methods. I think it is worth emphasizing before embarking into perturbative calculations of the energy of the fluctuations.

I actually wrote something similar yesterday.. I thought it was in this particular thread.. that is why I wrote about perturbation calculations in my latest posts.. doh, I must get my memory back :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K