Why Is the Path Integral W[J] a Vacuum-to-Vacuum Amplitude?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PGaccount
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amplitude Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The path integral W[J] in quantum field theory represents a vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude, expressed as W[J] = ⟨0+|0-⟩J = ∫ D[Φ] eiS + ∫ JΦ. This formulation highlights the significance of the "i ε" prescription in understanding the vacuum transition amplitude influenced by an external source J. The discussion references Srednicki's work, particularly in the context of partition functions and their relation to vacuum expectation values (vev). The integral representation of the Gaussian integral is also explored, linking it to trace operations in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with path integrals and vacuum expectation values (vev)
  • Knowledge of the "i ε" prescription in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of Gaussian integrals and trace operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the "i ε" prescription in quantum field theory for deeper insights
  • Explore Srednicki's "Quantum Field Theory" for detailed explanations on partition functions
  • Learn about the mathematical foundations of Gaussian integrals in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between trace operations and path integrals in QFT
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, theoretical physicists, and students of quantum field theory seeking to understand vacuum-to-vacuum amplitudes and their mathematical representations.

PGaccount
Messages
85
Reaction score
25
In the functional integral approach to quantum field theory, we have

W[J] = ⟨0+|0-J = ∫ D[Φ] eiS + ∫ JΦ

Can someone give me some insight into why this path integral is a vacuum-to-vacuum amplitude. How and also why does this path integral W[J] become a vev?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't it discussed in Sredinicki's?
 
It is important to carefully take into account the "##\mathrm{i} \epsilon## prescription to understand, why this is the "vacuum-to-vacuum transition amplitude under influence of the external source ##J##". See my QFT manuscript,

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf
In Sect. 1.10 it's explained for ordinary non-relativistic QT of a single particle. It translates easily to the QFT case, which is treated in Sect. 3.5 ff.
 
I guess, because this is the partition function, ##\langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \int e^{iS} \mathrm{O}## similar to ## \langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \mathrm{tr \ O \rho}##, we get

$$\langle 0 | 0 \rangle = \int e^{iS}$$

@vanhees71 how does this fit in with what you said about iε?
 
Also, is there a way to interpret the infinite gaussian integral

$$\int dx \ e^{-x^T A x}$$

as a trace? I mean, is it possible to think of ##x^T A x## as a matrix element of A, i.e. ##A_{xx} = \langle x | A | x \rangle##? Then the integral can be written

$$\int dx \ e^{- A_{xx}} = tr \ e^{-A} = \left( \frac{1}{\det \mathrm{A}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}} $$

Then for free field theories, ##\int e^{iS}## can be written as a trace ##tr \ e^{-A}## where A is the inverse of the propagator. This would make the analogy with ##\langle \ \rangle = tr \rho## and ##\langle \mathrm{O} \rangle = \mathrm{tr O\rho}## exact
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K