Validation of a Work/Energy Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mattchu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a work and energy problem involving a box sliding down a frictionless incline and then moving across a horizontal surface with friction. The problem requires finding the speeds of the box at various points and determining the coefficient of kinetic friction under different conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply conservation of energy principles to find speeds and the coefficient of friction, but expresses uncertainty about missing elements in their calculations.
  • Some participants question the treatment of forces and energy, particularly regarding the work done by friction and the potential energy involved when the box moves to different heights.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the assumptions made about the forces acting on the box, especially in relation to the incline and the effects of friction.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, providing feedback and raising questions about the assumptions and methods used. There is a mix of validation and critique of the approaches taken, with some guidance offered on how to think about the energy changes involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the box moving from a frictionless surface to a surface with friction, and the need to account for changes in height and the work done against friction. Some participants note confusion regarding the problem's setup and the implications of the incline on the forces involved.

Mattchu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first post here. I was just wondering if anyone could validate my work done on this problem. (I have a feeling I missed something)

Here is the problem: A box of mass m is released from rest at Point A, the top of a long, frictionless slide. Point A is at height H above the level of Points B and C. Although the slide is frictionless, the horizontal surface from Point B to C is not. The coeffiecent of kinetic friction between the box and this surface is [mu] sub k, and the horizontal distance between Points B and C is x.

A) Find the speed of the box when its height above Point B is 1/2H .

B) Find the speed of the box when it reaches Point B.

[Edit in:]
C) Determine the value of [mu]k so that the box comes to rest at Point C.
[/Edit]

D) Now assume that Points B and C were not on the same horizontal level. In particular, assume that the surface from B to C had a uniform upward slope so that Point C was still at a horizontal distance of x from B but not at a vertical height of y above B. Answer the question posed in part (c).

E) If the slide were not frictionless, determine the work done by friction as the box moved from Point A to Point B if the speed of the box as it reached Point B was half the speed calculated in part (b).

My answers in variable form (I'm guessing that's how my teacher wanted them answered):

A) PE sub a + KE sub a + W = PE sub b + KE sub b
mg1/2h sub a = 1/2mv^2
[squ] = square root, not check
[squ] 2(g1/2h sub a) = v

B) gh sub a = 1/2v^2
[squ]2(gh sub a) = v

I'll just post my answer for the last two here because posting all of the work in order would take too long...

C) [mu] sub k = -(v sub c ^2 - v sub b^2 / N)

D) [mu] sub k = -(gh + 1/2v sub c ^2 - 1/2v sub b^2 / N)


[Edit in:]
E) fk = -(mvb^2 / 4mgha)
[/Edit]


I believe my problem is I'm not counting the force w sin [the] in the conservation of energy stuff but I'm not sure.


I'd appreciate any help. Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the [ sub ] and [ /sub ] tags to create subscript.

Part B:

You need to account for the work done by friction as the box is sliding from B to C.

Part C:

You need to include not only the extra energy to raise the box, but also the extra friction from the increased normal force (if any)

Part D:

You should ignore part C for this answer. It's effectively asking how much energy would be lost if the speed was halved.
 
Part B: The slide from Points A to B was frictionless, though.

Part C: When you say energy to raise the box, you mean energy of potential? If so, I do have that in the equation (gh). I eliminated m from both sides.

Part D: Actually I did ignore part C, but I ended up with similar looking answers.
 
I found your original statement of the problem somewhat puzzling, since you mention a horizontal surface from B to C, but then it never comes up.
Originally posted by Mattchu
Part B: The slide from Points A to B was frictionless, though.
You solved that fine; VB= √(2gH)

Part C: When you say energy to raise the box, you mean energy of potential? If so, I do have that in the equation (gh). I eliminated m from both sides.
I do not understand the problem. Can you restate what is being asked for?
Part D: Actually I did ignore part C, but I ended up with similar looking answers.
Reread NateTG's response. (Point C is not involved.)
 
Thanks for bringing that up, Doc Al, because I reread my questions and answers and found that I had not posted question c or answer e. Now they should all be in the right places. Hopefully this clarifies any confusion you had with the problem.

I edited my first post if you want to take a look at it again.
 
Now that's better.

C) Here's how I'd do it. All the kinetic energy at B gets dissipated as work done by friction:
KEB = FfrictionX
mgH = μmgX
μ = H/X

D)I assume you meant to say that the position of point C is X (horizontal) and Y (vertical) from point B? In this case, the final energy at C = mgy (potential); the distance along which the friction acts is D = √(X2 + Y2); and the normal force is mg cosθ = mg(X/D). Thus:

mgH-mgY= μmg(X/D)D = μmgX
μ = (H-Y)/X (interesting, eh?)

E) if the speed is cut in half, what happens to the KE at the bottom compared to the no friction case? That loss in KE equals the work done by friction.
 
Two things I don't understand from your post: why did you substitute mgH for the value of KEb in question c? I assume you meant 1/2mvb^2.

Also, on question d, why did you put the force as mg cos [the]? Isn't it mg sin [the] when something is moving up an inclined plane?
 
Originally posted by Mattchu
Two things I don't understand from your post: why did you substitute mgH for the value of KEb in question c? I assume you meant 1/2mvb^2.
I substituted mgH because that's what the KE equals! You have to solve the problem in terms of what is given, which is the height H. (Leaving KE = 1/2mvb^2 is true by definition, but does not solve the problem. It's kind of lazy! )
Also, on question d, why did you put the force as mg cos [the]? Isn't it mg sin [the] when something is moving up an inclined plane?
What is needed is the normal force, which is perpendicular to the plane.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K