Validity of Acoustic Weapon Effects

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the biological effects of acoustic weapons, highlighting conflicting scientific claims regarding their impact on organisms, including symptoms like nausea and disorientation. Various sources, including older scientific articles and modern government reports, present contradictory information, complicating the understanding of these weapons' validity. Notably, the use of Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRAD) for crowd control has been documented in the U.S., while the ACLU has prepared responses regarding their implications. The debate is further muddled by conspiracy theories and sensational media coverage.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of acoustic weapon technology, specifically Long Range Acoustic Devices (LRAD)
  • Familiarity with infrasound and its psychological effects
  • Knowledge of government reports and scientific literature on biological effects
  • Awareness of media influence on public perception of scientific topics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific literature on the biological effects of infrasound
  • Examine case studies of LRAD use in crowd control situations
  • Investigate the ACLU's position and findings on acoustic weapons
  • Analyze the role of media in shaping public understanding of acoustic weaponry
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for military researchers, acoustic engineers, policymakers, and anyone interested in the ethical implications and scientific validity of acoustic weapon technologies.

chemisthypnos
Note: this is a re-post from the physics area because this thread is probably more appropriate for this content.

There is a lot of rather contradictory information present on the biological effects of acoustic weapons with a bevy of scientific articles claiming that they cause harm to biological organisms with effects such as nausia, gagging, and disorientation. These articles are mostly from older scientific articles and modern government scientific reports on the issue, and statements by military leaders overseeing the development of the weapons (including defence contractors). Contradictory claims are also being made by a multitude of scientific sources from a variety of different countries and backgrounds.

I am not sure which one is correct after reading about a dozen articles from both sides. Does anyone have any insight on this issue?

Of note, there are a multitude of crackpots and conspiracy theorists that believe that the acoustic weapons are real and can do outworldly things- the media seems to have bought into these speculations thouroughly and should probably not be trusted.

Here are two articles (one claiming they work and the other denying it especially pertaining to infrasound):

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...oolever).pdf&usg=AOvVaw1lN5i64oG06oD52eJZOYRo

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...9altmann.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3Nro8eXDizm43lgLukgW4z
 
Biology news on Phys.org
All I know is that use of such weapons has been reported in the US as riot-control in e.g., Ferguson MO,

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_t...ound_cannons_were_used_for_crowd_control.html

and that the ACLU has prepared a response:

https://www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/field_document/acoustic_weapons.pdf

These seem to be hearing-range acoustic devices. (there are yootooobe videos showing such devices and their use)
Infrasound? I know they DO cause an emotional response (you've probably experienced it in action and horror movies in a high-end theater), but damage, etc... don't know for sure...

at least the Federal Gov't (yeah- that highly reliable source of alternative facts...) asserts that these have been used against US and Canadian diplomats in Cuba. That assertion has been questioned.

http://www.iflscience.com/technology/sonic-weapons-attack-american-diplomats-cuba/

Cheers!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K