Validity of Navier-Stokes at Extreme Mach Nos. (M = 100,000)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of the Navier-Stokes equations at extreme Mach numbers, specifically at Mach 100,000. It concludes that at such high velocities, particularly in hypersonic conditions, the Navier-Stokes equations may lose their applicability due to the transition from continuum flow to free molecular flow. The breakdown occurs because of reduced molecular collisions and significant temperature and pressure differentials across shock boundaries. The Boltzmann equation becomes relevant for high Knudsen numbers, serving as a generalization of the Navier-Stokes equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Navier-Stokes equations
  • Knowledge of continuum mechanics
  • Familiarity with free molecular flow concepts
  • Basic principles of the Boltzmann equation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of high Knudsen numbers on fluid dynamics
  • Study the Boltzmann equation and its derivation of the Navier-Stokes equations
  • Explore relativistic fluid dynamics and its applications
  • Investigate the effects of shock waves on fluid behavior at hypersonic speeds
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in fluid dynamics, aerospace engineers, physicists studying high-speed flows, and anyone interested in the limitations of classical fluid mechanics at extreme velocities.

K41
Messages
94
Reaction score
1
So, speaking theoretically, if you could accelerate a fluid to extreme Mach number at sea level, then at what point does the Navier Stokes number lose its validity? What equations would you then use to model this potentially extreme momentum?

I presume based on the fact that Newton's Law's are an approximation to the classical world that only really fail at extreme velocities approaching the speed of light, how close to those velocities do we need to be before we need to worry about the validity of the equations and can we apply corrections to N-S to correct for this?

Finally, is it theoretically possible to collect a group of neutrino's for instance, compact them so that they can regarded as a continuum (very low Knudsen number) and therefore model this from using what we've just discussed?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
That is more to do with small scale phenomena. I was looking more specifically at extreme velocity. But you are correct in thinking that inevitably at higher velocities, smaller scales must be found. There must surely be a limit to this though.
 
Navier–Stokes equations balance momentum in the flow, and are utilized in the "continuum flow" regime. At very high supersonic speeds for high altitudes continuum flow mechanics start to break down and are replaced by "free molecular" flow due to reduced collisions between gas molecules. I'm by no means an expert in this area, but I know a practical example of free molecular flow is the a space vehicle re-entering the atmosphere.

My feeling is at very high hypersonic speeds and low altitudes continuum flow equations will start to break down due to the temperature and pressure delta across the shock boundary (if that boundary is hot enough to "induce" free molecular flow-like conditions in the shock's wake). It might be Navier-Stokes works if utilized in concert with some "creative" boundary conditions, but when you're talking M > 100,000 it's anyone's guess as to what's going on there... The speed you're describing is over 1/10 the speed of light, my guess is travel through an atmosphere at that speed would be like setting off a nuclear bomb in front of the vehicle.
 
Here is a nice introduction to relativistic fluid dynamics. Practical applications are I think mainly in the area of plasma physics:

http://mathreview.uwaterloo.ca/archive/voli/2/olsthoorn.pdf

For high Knudsen numbers, you need to solve the Boltzmann equation, I think you can derive the Navier-Stokes equations from it, so you can see it as a generalization of the N-S equations.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K