How to apply Navier-Stokes equations?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kricket
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Apply Navier-stokes
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the application of the Navier-Stokes equations for modeling fluid flow, specifically in the context of simulating the behavior of a frisbee in air. Participants explore the challenges of solving these equations and consider alternative approaches and tools for obtaining useful approximations of fluid dynamics related to drag and lift coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in using the Navier-Stokes equations to model fluid flow around a frisbee but seeks clarification on how to implement a simulator for this purpose.
  • Another participant notes that the Navier-Stokes equations are non-linear partial differential equations that typically require numerical techniques for solutions, as direct solutions are computationally intensive.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations with turbulence models may be a more practical approach for approximating solutions.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of using professional software for fluid dynamics simulations, questioning the availability of demo versions or access through universities.
  • Another participant proposes that solving the Navier-Stokes equations may be overkill for the frisbee problem and suggests considering the Blasius approach for external viscous flow as a simpler alternative.
  • Concerns are raised about the complexity of programming a solution for the Navier-Stokes equations, particularly regarding the small length scales involved in fluid dynamics.
  • A suggestion is made to seek out computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software available at mechanical engineering departments, although access may be limited.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to modeling the frisbee's fluid dynamics. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the use of the Navier-Stokes equations versus alternative methods like the Blasius approach, as well as the practicality of using professional software.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the challenges of solving the Navier-Stokes equations, including the need for numerical methods and the potential complexity of programming such solutions. There is also mention of the limitations of using these equations for specific applications like modeling a frisbee.

Kricket
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Still at my frisbee modeling program, I started to ask myself how I could get better approximations of stuff like COP versus angle-of-attack, drag/lift coefficients, etc. I've been checking out the Navier-Stokes equations because I understand they can be used to model fluid flow around an object? However, I'm having trouble seeing how I could write a simulator that would chug along and give me some useful values...

Can somebody give me an explanation of what would be required to apply these equations to a given object at a given velocity moving through the air? From what I can gather, it looks like solving the equations gives you the vector field for the air, which you would then use to calculate the force acting on the object at N different points on its surface...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Navier Stokes are a bunch of non-linear partial differential equations. They cannot be solves though convential means, unless the non-linear parts are = to zero. This means numerical techniques must be used, they arent plug and chug.

You would also never Solve NS equations directly as it would be computationally monsterous to try to calculate the exact movement of a fluid.

What is more commonly used is a time based approach. RANS (Reynolds averages Navier Stokes) uses turbulenc models and averaged flow to approximate a solution to NS.
Thta is basically all I can rememver from my fluids modelling course, someone else here who is better at maths will be able to explain in more detail.
 
Yeah, I know they're PDEs and a big pain in the poop-chute...I'm a computer/math guy and by "chug" I meant, write some complicated program that approximates a solution for a given tiny dt (and d-whatever else) a few thousand times, and see what comes out.

Alternatively, I've heard that there's (very expensive) professional software out there that does this; is there any chance of finding a demo version or perhaps a university that would let me use it for my small, simple example?
 
Hey, a couple of things.

1. It may be overkill to solve your frisby problem with the Navier-Stokes equations - I mean I would start by looking at the Blaussius Approach to external viscous flow where you asymptotically patch together viscous solutions (with approximations) near your frisby with potential flow solutions far way from the frisby.

2. I'd be worried about creating a computer program, no matter how complicated for the standard Navier-Stokes equations because you'll find that your length scales become nightmarishly small.

3. Most Mechanical Engineering divisions will have CFD software, ACE is the one my university uses and it is quite easy to learn to use (although I wouldn't have a clue how to deal with a rotating object like a frisby). Although you'll find that unless the fluids academics are really good blokes your not going to be allowed to temporarily use their software - you'd do better to ask one of the students doing a fluids course for a cracked academic copy.

Regards,
Thrillhouse
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
426
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K