Value of Mexican hat potential

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of the Mexican hat potential derived from the Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L} = \bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu}{\partial_{\mu}}-y\phi)\psi +\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi)^{2}-V(\phi)$$, where the potential energy is defined as $$V(\phi) = \frac{1}{2}\kappa^{2}\phi^{2} + \frac{\lambda}{24}\phi^{4}$$. For $$\kappa^{2}=-|\kappa^{2}|$$, the potential exhibits a Mexican hat shape, with stationary points at $$\phi = \pm \sqrt{\frac{6|\kappa^{2}|}{\lambda}}$$ indicating true vacua and an unstable configuration at $$\phi = 0$$. The discussion also explores using classical equations of motion to demonstrate the instability of the $$\phi(x) = 0$$ configuration, emphasizing the evaluation of free energy from the path integral in the classical limit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and field theory
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of classical equations of motion
  • Experience with path integrals and free energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Mexican hat potential in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the stability analysis of field configurations using classical equations of motion
  • Explore path integral formulation and its application in calculating free energy
  • Investigate the implications of local maxima in potential energy landscapes
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, as well as graduate students seeking to deepen their understanding of potential energy landscapes and stability analysis in field configurations.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
Consider the Lagrangian

$$\mathcal{L} = \bar{\psi}(i\gamma^{\mu}{\partial_{\mu}}-y\phi)\psi +\frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\phi)^{2}-V(\phi),$$

where the potential energy ##V(\phi)## is given by

$$V(\phi) = \frac{1}{2}\kappa^{2}\phi^{2} + \frac{\lambda}{24}\phi^{4}.$$

For ##\kappa^{2}=-|\kappa^{2}|##, we obtain a mexican hat potential.

The stationary points of this potential give us the true vacua ##\phi = \pm \sqrt{\frac{6|\kappa^{2}|}{\lambda}}## of this potential as well as the unstable field configuration ##\phi = 0##.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there an alternative way, for example, by using the classical equations of motion of ##\phi## (setting ##\psi## to zero) to show that the
field configuration ##\phi(x) = 0## is unstable?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You want to choose the solution that minimizes the free energy which you can just compute from the path integral. The classical limit means that you are evaluating it on the saddle point i.e., the equations of motion.
 
radium said:
You want to choose the solution that minimizes the free energy which you can just compute from the path integral. The classical limit means that you are evaluating it on the saddle point i.e., the equations of motion.

Computing the free energy (from the path integral) and then minimising it and then evaluating it on the saddle point is overkill as I already have the classical equation of motion.

Do you have some way to use the classical equations of motion of ##\phi## (setting ##\psi## to zero) to show that the field configuration ##\phi(x) = 0## is unstable?
 
Yes, what I wrote is how you would do it.

In general, you show that something is unstable by showing that it is actually a local maximum of the free energy. In this case case you evaluate the free energy from the path integral on the equations of motion in the classical limit, so this is how you would see that there is an instability using the equations of motion.
 
Can you provide a few steps to show how to do this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K