Variable pulley distance - tensioner force help needed

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the design and operation of a belted pulley drive system, specifically focusing on the tensioning mechanism involving an idler pulley. Participants are exploring the necessary force to apply to a pneumatic cylinder to maintain proper belt tension under varying conditions, including pulley distances and operational speeds.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Rob describes the system's configuration, including the dimensions of the belt and pulleys, and the variable distance between the driveR and driveN pulleys.
  • Rob seeks to determine the ideal proportional curve of the idler force based on the geometry of the system.
  • Some participants question the necessity of the pulley system, suggesting a direct motor connection to the driven shaft might be more efficient.
  • Concerns are raised about the reliability of the system, particularly regarding the forces acting on the pulleys and the potential for damage to belts and bearings.
  • Rob mentions difficulties in obtaining application support from the belt supplier and the challenges faced by mechanical engineers in calculating the required forces.
  • Rob plans to provide diagrams to clarify the setup and facilitate further discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the design choices, particularly regarding the necessity of the idler pulley system versus a direct motor connection. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the best approach to achieve the desired tensioning.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dynamic nature of the system, including variations in pulley wrap amount, spans, distances, and RPMs, which complicate the calculations for the required tensioning force.

supernaught
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Greetings, lurked for a long time, but I need some help here so I joined up. Please have some patience with me if I miss any important information.

I am working on a belted pulley drive system where the driveN pulley will move relative to the driveR while in the stopped state.
An outside idler pulley is used to take up the slack as the distance between R&N changes.
I did not design this system, but I am tasked with making it work.

The idler force is managed using a proportional valved pneumatic cylinder, controlled by a PLC which also knows the distance between the R & N pulleys.

I need to know the force to apply to the cylinder in order to maintain correct tension on the belt to prevent skipping and excessive wear.

Here are the conditions

The belt is 1750mm long, 8mm pitch, synchronous(ribbed), 30mm wide
The pitch diameter of the R&N pulleys are the same ~180mm
The idler pulley(smooth) diameter is ~160mm
The distance between the R & N pulleys is variable between 485mm and 560mm

The next part that makes this more difficult (at least in my head) is that the idler does not apply force perpendicular to the line between the pulleys. The DriveN pulley and the idler move on a parallel axis, offset by ~185mm(from pulley centres).

To illustrate this, picture an XY plane with the driveR fixed at (X0 Y0). The driveN pulley can travel between (X-400 Y400) and (X-286 Y400). The idler then travels along a rail at Y215, parallel to the N pulley just to keep tension.

Power
The power and speed transmitted from driveR is variable. There is a 2 speed gearbox(4:1 & 1:1) where speed is limited (4:1 is 0-1500rpm), 1:1 is 1500-6000rpm. This is a speed controlled motor, so maximum power available is 45KW peak through a very wide rpm range.

So all I really need to know, is what is the ideal proportional curve/slope of the idler force given the geometry.

Feel free to ask for more information, I am interested in sorting this out. Also if there is a calculator somewhere that could help me figure this out(as well as forces acting on the pulley shafts at maximum power output in 4:1 gear), it would be greatly appreciated.

Many thanks,
Rob
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Also, I have some diagrams of the setup that might help, but I will post tomorrow if I can.
 
I'm having a hard time imagining a situation where this is the best solution.

Why can't the motor connect directly to the driven shaft?

supernaught said:
I did not design this system, but I am tasked with making it work.

Ah, So you'll be the scapegoat when it fails ;-)

As for the problem at hand, the works been done already, the belt manufacturer will have all the tensioner data you require.
 
billy_joule said:
I'm having a hard time imagining a situation where this is the best solution.

Why can't the motor connect directly to the driven shaft?

This motor is driving 3 separate shafts... 2 of the shafts will move independently, relative to the main drive. the 3rd driven shaft is fixed, and does not have an idler.
billy_joule said:
Ah, So you'll be the scapegoat when it fails ;-)

As for the problem at hand, the works been done already, the belt manufacturer will have all the tensioner data you require.

Having trouble getting good application support from the belt supplier right now, and my mech engineers are having a tricky time getting the range of forces needed and generated for this system to work reliably(we don't want damage belts or bearings by pushing the shaft side-load too high), considering how dynamic the system is(pulley and idler wrap amount, spans, pulley distances, rpms, etc.)

I will try to get some images up today of what I'm describing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K