Variation of escape velocity with equal surface gravity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem comparing the escape velocities of two planets with the same surface gravity, where one planet has a greater radius but is less massive than the other. Participants are analyzing the implications of the given conditions on escape velocity and surface gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between mass, radius, and surface gravity, questioning the consistency of the problem's premises. There is discussion about the formula for escape velocity and how it relates to the planets' characteristics.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the problem's assumptions, with some participants expressing doubt about the validity of the question as stated. Various interpretations of the relationship between mass, radius, and surface gravity are being explored, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the question may be flawed due to the conflicting conditions of mass and radius affecting surface gravity. The discussion highlights the need for clarity in the problem's setup.

sachin
Messages
61
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
the question says "There are two Planets, each with the same surface gravity, but Planet 1 has a greater radius and is less massive then Planet 2. Which of these planets has a greater escape velocity? "
Relevant Equations
__ GMm/R + 1/2 m v2 = 0, so v escape = root 2GM/R, which is not directly dependent on g, as g = GM/R2
the question says "There are two Planets, each with the same surface gravity, but Planet 1 has a greater radius and is less massive then Planet 2. Which of these planets has a greater escape velocity? "
(A) Planet 1
(B) Planet 2
(C) Both have the same escape velocity because surface gravity is equal
(D) Not enough information is given

we have,
__ GMm/R + 1/2 m v2 = 0, so v escape = root 2GM/R, which is not directly dependent on g, as g = GM/R2,

my concern is probably the question given in ap physics worksheet in the link given below is needing correction as if mass of the planet M is less and also it has more radius than the other planet, it can never have the same surface gravity which is given by g = GM/R2,

http://content.njctl.org/courses/sc...-gravitation-multiple-choice-2-2015-12-06.pdf

the answer given in the sheet is option is option B i.e Planet 2,

how is it possible,
thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The answer is more or less given to you. They are spheres and M1 has less mass.
 
sachin said:
if mass of the planet M is less and also it has more radius than the other planet, it can never have the same surface gravity which is given by g = GM/R2,
I agree - I don't think the question is consistent. If the surface gravity is to be the same and the mass is less, the radius must also be less.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444
sachin said:
v escape = root 2GM/R, which is not directly dependent on g, as g = GM/R2
... but you know that ##g## is the same for both planets so you can use that to eliminate either ##M## or ##R##. You know that ##M = gR^2/G## and so
$$
v_{\rm esc} = \sqrt{\frac{2GM}{R}} = \sqrt{\frac{2GgR^2}{RG}} = \sqrt{2gR}
$$
Draw your conclusions from there.

However:
sachin said:
Planet 1 has a greater radius and is less massive then Planet 2.
This is impossible. If they are supposed to have the same ##g##, then ##M/R^2## must be the same for both planets. If the radius increases, then so must the mass in order to maintain the same ##g## at the surface.

hutchphd said:
The answer is more or less given to you. They are spheres and M1 has less mass.
Having less mass does not necessarily imply lower escape velocity, it depends on the radius. Compare the Sun to a (hypothetical) primordial black hole of an Earth mass or so.
 
It should be noted that ##M \propto \rho R^3## where ##\rho## is the average density. This would make ##g \propto \rho R## and therefore the density must be lower if the radius increases. This could possibly be what the questioner intended, but generally I would assume "more massive" to refer to the actual mass and not the specific mass (i.e., density) of an object.
 
so, hope i can conclude that the given question is wrong, thanks.
 
Wrong in the sense of the stated premise not being correct, yes. It would be a reasonable question if they removed either the statement about the radius or that of the mass.
 
Orodruin said:
Wrong in the sense of the stated premise not being correct, yes. It would be a reasonable question if they removed either the statement about the radius or that of the mass.
Clearly the answer is E: too much information is given
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K