Variations of +/-; Can there be more than just positive and negative particles?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the nature of particle charges, confirming that only positive, negative, and neutral charges exist within the electromagnetic field. Neutral particles, such as neutrons and neutrinos, arise from combinations of charged particles, like protons and electrons. The conversation highlights the concept of "color charge" in quarks, which operates under the strong force, distinct from electromagnetic interactions. Ultimately, the discussion concludes that variations in electromagnetic fields do not exist, as any modification would result in a different field altogether.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, including protons, electrons, and neutrons.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic fields and their properties.
  • Knowledge of quark types and color charge in the context of the strong force.
  • Basic grasp of the differences between electromagnetic charge and gravitational mass.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of neutral particles, focusing on neutrons and neutrinos.
  • Explore the concept of color charge in quarks and its implications in particle physics.
  • Study the differences between electromagnetic and gravitational forces in detail.
  • Investigate theoretical frameworks for alternative fields and their potential charges.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental forces and particles that govern the universe.

tesla420
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Is there any evidence that suggests there can be more than just positive and negative particles
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None, unless you're thinking of neutral particles with zero charge - there are plenty of those.
 
Quarks have something called "color charge". There are three kinds, labelled red,green,blue.
 
Nugatory said:
None, unless you're thinking of neutral particles with zero charge - there are plenty of those.

How are neutral particles with zero charge created?
 
What would be the result of a protron and a electron combining inside the particle
 
tesla420 said:
What would be the result of a proton and a electron combining inside the particle

Either a hydrogen atom (the most common case of combining a proton and an electron) or by electron capture, a neutron. Both are neutral.
 
There are only positive (e.g. proton, up quark), negative (e.g. electron, down quark) and neutral (e.g. neutron, neutrino) electromagnetic charges.

What other options could there be? You'd have to start talking about vectors.
 
But is there any kind of evidence that suggests that there might be diffrent types of charges if it were in a diffrent electro magnetic field
 
Well, particles have colour charges which interact in the strong field.

But in electromagnetism, the electromagnetic charge is what dictates how the particle moves in the electromagnetic field.
 
  • #10
For the electro-magnetic interaction, there is only the one type of charge, which is positive or negative. Neutrons are composites of charged quarks, which add up to 0 net charge.

For other types of forces, there are values that act like charge but aren't the same thing. For gravity, there is gravitational mass, which functions the same way, except it is always positive. As others have mentioned, quarks also interact through the Strong Force, which has multiple types of 'color charge'.
 
  • #11
tesla420 said:
But is there any kind of evidence that suggests that there might be diffrent types of charges if it were in a diffrent electro magnetic field

There is only one EM field and it only has + and - charges. We can't talk about "different" EM fields since they don't exist.
 
  • #12
Do you mean we can't talk about it on this forum because it is against the rules
 
  • #13
tesla420 said:
Do you mean we can't talk about it on this forum because it is against the rules

Well, yes, but what I really mean is that the EM field has been observed to have these particular rules. Another field with different rules would not be an EM field. Even slightly modifying the current EM field would result in another field, not our own EM field. So when you ask about "different" EM fields it's like asking what would the weather be like on another Earth. Well, there's only one Earth so the question doesn't make much sense.

We could easily come up with different rules for another field. Perhaps our imaginary field has thirty-seven different types of charges, but since the field doesn't really exist we haven't really gotten anywhere, have we?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K