Vector Division: Is It Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Division Vector
Click For Summary
Vector division is not a standard operation in vector mathematics, as division requires a corresponding multiplication operation that satisfies the cancellation property. While traditional vector operations include addition, subtraction, and scalar multiplication, the cross product does not allow for division. However, in two-dimensional vector spaces, such as complex numbers, a form of multiplication exists that enables a type of division. Quaternions extend this concept to four-dimensional spaces but still do not provide a general division for vectors. Overall, division of vectors is not commonly defined in standard mathematical contexts.
neutrino
Messages
2,091
Reaction score
2
From school, we've had addition, "subtraction" of vectors and then scalar multiplication, dot & cross products. I have never come across dividing a vector by another. Is there such an operation?

Eagerly awaiting enlightening replies,
Nanveeth
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In order to have division one needs a multiplication which for which the cancellation property holds (amongst other things)

xy=xz => y=z

what multiplication do you want to use? cross product won't do...

actually there is a way of defining a multiplication such that there is a division for two dimensional vectors (have you heard of complex numbers?).
 
This is actually a general question that I have and I'm not planning to use it anywhere for now.

Btw, I'm a second-year physics undergrad.
 
And my answer still remains: division is defined in terms of multiplication. 1/2 is the number which when multiplied by 2 yields 1 etc.

The complex numbers are a two dimensional real vector space which posses such a multiplication. THe quaternions a 4-d real vector space.

In *general* we do not have a division of vectors.

I don't know what being a second year physics undergrad means per se in relation to my post (was it supposed to indicate you know what complex numbers are? If you were at Cambridge then you'd know what complex numbers are, if you were at some less than stellar state or private university in the US then you probably wouldn't)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K