MHB Vector equation of a spherical surface

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the vector equation of a spherical surface defined by the equation $(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{b})\cdot\mathbf{x} = 0$. It establishes that this equation represents a sphere centered at $\mathbf{x} = \frac{1}{2}\mathbf{b}$ with a radius of $\frac{1}{2}b$. Participants clarify that the goal is to prove the distance from point $\mathbf{x}$ to the center $\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{b}$ equals the radius, leading to the expression $(\mathbf{x} - \frac{1}{2}\mathbf{b})^2 = (\frac{1}{2}b)^2$. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the vectors involved rather than equating them directly. The thread concludes with a focus on the mathematical proof required to validate the spherical surface equation.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Let the position vector of an arbitrary point $P(x_1x_2x_3)$ be $\mathbf{x} =x_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i$, and let $\mathbf{b} = b_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i$ be a constant vector.
Show that $(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{b})\cdot\mathbf{x} = 0$ is the vector equation of a spherical surface having its center at $\mathbf{x} = \frac{1}{2}\mathbf{b}$ with radius of $\frac{1}{2}b$.
\begin{alignat}{3}
(x_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i - b_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i)\cdot x_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i & = & x_i^2-b_ix_i
\end{alignat}
How am I supposed to obtain that $b_i = x_i$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dwsmith said:
Let the position vector of an arbitrary point $P(x_1x_2x_3)$ be $\mathbf{x} =x_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i$, and let $\mathbf{b} = b_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i$ be a constant vector.
Show that $(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{b})\cdot\mathbf{x} = 0$ is the vector equation of a spherical surface having its center at $\mathbf{x} = \frac{1}{2}\mathbf{b}$ with radius of $\frac{1}{2}b$.
\begin{alignat}{3}
(x_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i - b_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i)\cdot x_i\hat{\mathbf{e}}_i & = & x_i^2-b_ix_i
\end{alignat}
How am I supposed to obtain that $b_i = x_i$?

You're not. That would mean $\mathbf b = \mathbf x$, but that is not what you need to prove.

You need to find the distance of $\mathbf x$ to $\frac 12 \mathbf b$ and proof that it is $\frac 12 b$.
That is, can you prove:
$(\mathbf x - \frac 12 \mathbf b)^2 \overset{?}{=} (\frac 12 b)^2$​
 
Last edited:
ILikeSerena said:
You're not. That would mean $\mathbf b = \mathbf x$, but that is not what you need to prove.

You need to find the distance of $\mathbf x$ to $\frac 12 \mathbf b$ and proof that it is $\frac 12 b$.
That is, can you prove:
$(\mathbf x - \frac 12 \mathbf b)^2 \overset{?}{=} (\frac 12 b)^2$​
$(\mathbf{x} -\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{b})^2 = \mathbf{x}\cdot\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{x}\cdot\mathbf{b} + \frac{1}{4}\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{b}$
How do I go from here?
 
dwsmith said:
$(\mathbf{x} -\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{b})^2 = \mathbf{x}\cdot\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{x}\cdot\mathbf{b} + \frac{1}{4}\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{b}$
How do I go from here?

What do you get from $(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{b})\cdot\mathbf{x} = 0$?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
901
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
829
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
591
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K