Vector Geometry and Vector Spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the distinction between vectors and radius vectors in the context of vector geometry and vector spaces, particularly in R^2. The user highlights a common confusion regarding vector representation, specifically the origin-based definition taught in academic settings versus the more flexible approach seen in physics. The conversation clarifies that while both methods are valid, they stem from different interpretations of vector operations, emphasizing the importance of a defined coordinate system for radius vectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of R^2 space and its properties
  • Familiarity with vector addition and the parallelogram rule
  • Knowledge of scalar products and polar coordinates
  • Basic concepts of coordinate systems in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between vectors and radius vectors in detail
  • Explore vector operations in different coordinate systems
  • Learn about the application of the parallelogram rule in vector subtraction
  • Investigate the implications of vector representation in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of mathematics and physics, particularly those studying vector geometry, as well as educators seeking to clarify the concepts of vector representation and operations.

SudanBlack
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Vector Geometry and Vector Spaces...

Hi - I've just started my degree course at university, studying theoretical physics. However, I have opted to attend the same maths lectures that some of the mathematics students are taking. We have been learning about "geometry and vectors in the plane", currently in R^2 space. The way we have defined vectors has their "tail" always at the orgin. (ie - a vector is an arrow pointing out of the origin) We have hence derived from this all of the necessary properties. (eg - we deal with addition of vecotrs by talking about parallograms, we have derived the scalar product using polar coordinates, etc)

However, when I was at school and indeed in my physics lectures, vectors do not always start at the origin. (for example, if vectors v and w both started at the orgin, in physics vector subtraction you would go from the "head" of v to the orgin to the head of w, forming w-v. But this "vector" does not start at the orgin - so is it actually the same as w-v?)

Obviously both methods must work, but since I was wondering if yhou could please explain to me how these 2 approaches are related? How are the mathematical principles I have been taught in my lectures extended to vectors not starting at the origin?

Many thanks in advance. :-)
 

Attachments

  • vectors.JPG
    vectors.JPG
    7.8 KB · Views: 643
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a difference between a vector and a radius vector. Vectors with 'tails' at the origin are called radius vectors, i.e. there is a bijection between R^2 and V^2(O). You can not talk about radius vectors unless you have defined a coordinate system.

SudanBlack said:
However, when I was at school and indeed in my physics lectures, vectors do not always start at the origin. (for example, if vectors v and w both started at the orgin, in physics vector subtraction you would go from the "head" of v to the orgin to the head of w, forming w-v. But this "vector" does not start at the orgin - so is it actually the same as w-v?)

Think of w - v as of w + (-v). Apply the parallelogram rule. So, where does w - v 'start'?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K