Vector multiplication question

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nabeshin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiplication Vector
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Messages
2,207
Reaction score
16
I'm not sure where to put this question, since it deals with both physics and math, so I figured here would be a good starting point.

In the book of astrodynamics I'm currently reading, I came across this expansion:

[tex](\vec{r}\times\vec{v})\times\vec{r}=[\vec{v}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{r})-\vec{r}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{v})][/tex]

Can anyone explain how this result is arrived at? If any physical significance is needed, r is a position vector and v its derivative with respect to time, the velocity vector.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, the standard way is just to use the vector triple product (Lagranges formula, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_product#Vector_triple_product"):

[tex]\vec{a}\times (\vec{b}\times \vec{c})= \vec{b}(\vec{a}\cdot\vec{c}) - \vec c (\vec a\cdot \vec b)[/tex]
(also know as the BAC CAB rule)

This relation can easily be proved, by calculating both sides (just insert [tex]\vec {a} = (a_1,a_2,a_3)[/tex] and so on).

In your case we have, [tex]\vec a = \vec c \equiv \vec r[/tex] and [tex]\vec b \equiv \dot{\vec r} = \vec v[/tex].
 
Last edited by a moderator:
? The "triple product" is just the same as the product asked about so I don't see how that answers your question, except to say "yes, it is a well known calculation". Of course, the way to see that it is true is to use some general <a, b, c>, <x, y, z> for [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{v}[/itex].

For a little more "intuitive" insight, we know that [itex]\vec{r}\times\vec{v}[/itex] is perpendicular to both [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{v}[/itex] so the result of any vector cross [itex]\vec{r}\times\vec{v}[/itex] must be perpendicular to that vector and so in the plane spanned by [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{v}[/itex] and can be written as a linear combination of them: [itex]a\vec{r}+ b\vec{v}[/itex]. But [itex](\vec{r}\times\vec{v})\times \vec{r}[/itex] must also be perpendicular to [itex]\vec{r}[/itex] so we must subtract off any projection onto [itex]\vec{r}[/itex]. That is the "[itex]\vec{r}(\vec{r}\cdot\vec{v}[/itex]" part.