Vector multiply that is NOT dot or cross?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of vector multiplication in the context of the Del operator, specifically regarding expressions that do not explicitly use dot or cross products. Participants explore the meanings of various vector operations such as F(∇.G), ∇(F.G), and (G.∇)F, as well as the implications of these notations in vector calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about vector multiplication without dot or cross notation, providing examples like F(∇.G) and ∇(F.G).
  • Another participant suggests that F(∇.G) represents scalar multiplication, where each component of F is multiplied by the scalar ∇.G.
  • A different participant presents an identity involving the Del operator, indicating that ∇x(FXG) includes terms like F(∇.G) and (G.∇)F.
  • One reply suggests that participants can simply "dot them together," referring to a resource for further clarification.
  • Another participant mentions the geometric product in Clifford algebras and the geometric derivative proposed by D. Hestenes as potentially relevant concepts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of understanding and confusion regarding the notation and operations discussed. While some explanations are provided, there is no consensus on a singular interpretation of the vector multiplication without explicit dot or cross notation.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific mathematical identities and operations, but there are unresolved aspects regarding the definitions and implications of the terms used, particularly in relation to the Del operator.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Hi - just working through my text (studying by correspondence) on Del operator - so Curl, div etc. Came across some identities parts of which which have me confused. what does it mean when a vector is shown as multiplying something - but without dot or cross? For example F(∇.G) or ∇(F.G) or (G.∇)F ...

I get that something like (G.∇) expands to each component of G times each component of ∇ - which is a scalar; also ∇.G is a normal dot product. So I understand f.(∇.G) and ∇.(F.G) and (G.∇).F and but am confused when the 'dot' outside the bracket is missing - how do we multiply those?

Thanks
Alan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you seeing the gradient of a scalar function? That is represented by a del operator and a capital letter which you might think is a vector.
 
These are all vectors, an example identity is
∇x(FXG) = F(∇.G) - G(∇.F) + (G.∇)F - (F.∇)G
 
Just dot them together:

http://academics.smcvt.edu/jellis-monaghan/calc3/in%20class%20maple%20demos/graddivcurl1.pdf

Check out Example 6.6
 
ognik said:
Hi - just working through my text (studying by correspondence) on Del operator - so Curl, div etc. Came across some identities parts of which which have me confused. what does it mean when a vector is shown as multiplying something - but without dot or cross? For example F(∇.G)
∇.G is a scalar function so F(∇.G) is "scalar multiplication"- each component of F multiplied by ∇.G

or ∇(F.G)
F.G is a scalar function so ∇(F.G) is the gradient of F.G

or (G.∇)F ...0
This is the same as G(∇.F)


I get that something like (G.∇) expands to each component of G times each component of ∇ - which is a scalar; also ∇.G is a normal dot product. So I understand f.(∇.G) and ∇.(F.G) and (G.∇).F and but am confused when the 'dot' outside the bracket is missing - how do we multiply those?

Thanks
Alan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ognik
Nice explanation thanks hallsofivy, I could see dotting them was the only way to get anything done, but its nice to understand why.
 
I'm not sure this is what you're looking for, but you might want to have a look at the definition of "geometric product" in Clifford algebras, plus the concept of "geometric derivative" proposed by D. Hestenes, which generalizes div,grad,curl operators.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K