Why do piecewise smooth function spaces require an infinite basis in PDEs?

Click For Summary
Piecewise smooth function spaces in partial differential equations (PDEs) require an infinite basis due to the nature of these functions, which can exhibit discontinuities and non-uniform behavior. Unlike finite-dimensional spaces that can be spanned by a limited number of vectors, piecewise smooth functions necessitate an infinite number of linearly independent smooth functions to accurately represent them. Fourier series are instrumental in this context, allowing for the representation of piecewise smooth functions as infinite sums of trigonometric functions. This infinite basis is essential for solving complex PDEs encountered in various fields, including physics and engineering. Understanding this concept expands the traditional view of vector spaces to accommodate the complexities of function spaces.
Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
The 3 dimensional space that we inhabit must have a basis of 3 vectors which is fair enough.

But in my partial differential equations class in which Fourier series was introduced, it was said that piecewise smooth function space has a basis of an infinite number of vectors. If there is a simple enough answer to this, I am curious to why this is. Does it have to do with the discontinuities that can arise in PWS space?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's because there are an infinite number of linearly independent smooth functions (forget even piecewise)

Take Functions from R to R

set f_i(x) = x^i, i in N

if the space were finite dimensional, of say dimension n, then given any n+1 of those functions, say just the first n+1, for ease, we could find real numbers a_i with

sum 0 to n a_ix^i equal to the zero function on R ie zero for all x in R. But poly of degree n has only n roots, doesn't it? so it can't be identically zero.
 


The concept of vector spaces and bases plays a crucial role in understanding partial differential equations (PDEs). In three-dimensional space, we can easily visualize a basis of three vectors that span the entire space. However, when dealing with PDEs, we often encounter functions that are not as simple as vectors in three-dimensional space. These functions can have discontinuities, non-uniform behavior, and infinite variations. Therefore, to fully understand and solve PDEs, we need to expand our understanding of vector spaces and bases.

In PDEs, we often work with functions that are defined on a specific domain, such as a finite interval or a region in space. These functions are known as piecewise smooth functions, as they may have discontinuities at certain points but are otherwise smooth. Unlike vectors in three-dimensional space, these functions cannot be represented by a finite number of basis vectors. Instead, they require an infinite number of basis functions to span the entire function space.

This is where Fourier series come into play. Fourier series provide a way to represent a piecewise smooth function as an infinite sum of trigonometric functions. These trigonometric functions form a basis for the function space and allow us to expand our understanding of vector spaces to include functions with infinite variations.

The reason why piecewise smooth function space requires an infinite number of basis vectors is due to the nature of these functions. As mentioned earlier, they can have discontinuities and non-uniform behavior, which cannot be captured by a finite number of basis vectors. Therefore, we need an infinite number of basis functions to accurately represent these functions and solve PDEs involving them.

In summary, the basis of vector spaces and Fourier series in PDEs is essential for understanding and solving these complex equations. The use of an infinite number of basis vectors allows us to expand our understanding of vector spaces and include functions with discontinuities and infinite variations. This is crucial in solving PDEs that arise in various fields such as physics, engineering, and mathematics.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K