Velocity addition formula for multiple velocities within each other

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on deriving an empirical formula for the velocity of multiple carts moving at the same speed relative to each other, utilizing the relativistic velocity-addition formula. The key formula discussed is the iterative application of the addition formula: v ⊕ u = (v + u) / (1 + vu), leading to the nth cart's velocity expressed as u_n = c * tanh(n * tanh^(-1)(u/c)). The discussion emphasizes the use of the Lorentz transformation and rapidity to derive a non-recursive formula for the nth cart's velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of relativistic physics and velocity addition
  • Familiarity with the Lorentz transformation
  • Knowledge of hyperbolic functions, specifically tanh
  • Basic mathematical induction principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation and applications of the Lorentz transformation
  • Study hyperbolic functions and their properties in physics
  • Explore mathematical induction techniques for proving formulas
  • Investigate the implications of rapidity in relativistic contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying relativistic mechanics or anyone interested in advanced concepts of velocity addition in physics.

um0123
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
I am having a problem coming up with an empirical formula for multiple objects moving with the same speed relative to each one up.

I.e. there is a cart moving with speed u relative to me, and inside it is a cart moving speed u relative to the cart is inside it. and inside that cart is a cart moving speed u relative to the second cart. and so on...

what i can't seem to come up with is an empirical formula that gives me the speed of the nth cart relative to me.

so far i understand that if i used the tanh(λ) formula to derive an empirical formula because it just seems to get bigger for each additional cart.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You simply have to iterate the relativistic velocity-addition formula (setting c=1)

v \oplus u = \frac{v+u}{1+vu}

Now assume that starting with u0 = 0 you have obtained un in the n.-th step; the next step is then

u_{n+1} = u_n \oplus u = \frac{u_n+u}{1+u_n u}

where I used v = un

You get

u_0 = 0

u_1 = u

u_2 = \frac{2u}{1+u^2}

\ldots
 
i got that much, but I am trying to find a formula that will tell me the velocity of any nth cart, so i need something empirical instead of recursive.
 
"Empirical" means "experimental", so you're probably looking for some other word.

I don't know if there's a simple way to write down such a formula, but if there is, the way to find it is to calculate the result for n=1,2,3,4,... as many as it takes for you to guess the result for an arbitrary n. And then you have to prove by induction that your guess is correct.
 
um0123 said:
... trying to find a formula that will tell me the velocity of any nth cart
In order to do that you should express the Lorentz transformation in terms of the rapidity θ. Then you take the matrix L(θ) defining the Lorentz transformation and calculate the n-th power Ln(θ) of this matrix. Using the "double argument formulas" for hyperbolic sine and cosine you will find that L2(θ) = L(2θ) and therefore you can guess that the Lorentz transformation is additive in terms of the rapidity, i.e. Ln(θ) = L(nθ). Doing that allows you to calculate θ(u) and n*θ(u) and invert this as un = u(n*θ(u1))

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation#Rapidity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_function#Comparison_with_circular_trigonometric_functions
 
Last edited:
um0123 said:
so far i understand that if i used the tanh(λ) formula to derive an empirical formula because it just seems to get bigger for each additional cart.
If we take the formula in post #2
tom.stoer said:
<br /> <br /> v \oplus u = \frac{v+u}{1+\frac{vu}{c^2}}<br /> <br />
and substitute u = c\,\tanh\lambda;\ v=c\,\tanh\mu, you get<br /> <br /> (c\,\tanh\lambda)\ \oplus\ (c\,\tanh\mu)\ =\ c\,\tanh(\lambda + \mu)<br /> <br />which leads to the result<br /> <br /> u_n\ =\ c\,\tanh\left(n\,\tanh^{-1}\frac{u}{c}\right)<br /> <br />If u is very small compared with c, this can be approximated as<br /> <br /> u_n\ \approx\ c\,\tanh\frac{nu}{c}<br /> <br />(All of the above is essentially what tom said in the last post, expressed in a different notation.)
 
DrGreg said:
(All of the above is essentially what tom said in the last post, expressed in a different notation.)
Yes, this is what I tried to indicate in post #5
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
950
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K