Velocity of Particles in Quantum Mechanics: Momentum & Computing Mean Values

Click For Summary
In quantum mechanics, the velocity of a particle is defined as the momentum operator divided by mass, but this can vary under different conditions, such as in the presence of a magnetic field. The group velocity of a wave, expressed as v_g = ∂ω/∂k, relates to the particle's energy and momentum, providing an alternative method for calculating mean velocity. Zitterbewegung motion presents a scenario where velocity is independent of momentum and equals the speed of light. In Hamiltonian mechanics, the relationship between position and momentum is maintained, with velocity expressed through the Heisenberg equation of motion. The discussion highlights the complexities of defining velocity in both non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics.
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
How do we define veliocity of a particle in QM?
How it's related to the momentum.
Are there any ways to cimpute quickly mean value of veliocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
one way is still with the same old fashion \bf{u} :)

however, another way is with the group velocity of a wave

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}

and this way can also be thought of as

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}=\frac{\partial E}{\partial p}

with E and p being the particle's energy and momentum respectively.

for more information on this go to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_velocity"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The velocity operator is the momentum operator divided by mass.
 
Hi.

Demystifier said:
The velocity operator is the momentum operator divided by mass.

Yes, you may define velocity as this. However in case you think of Zitterbewegung motion, velocity has nothing to do with momentum and its magnitude is c, velocity of light.

Regards.
 
jfy4 said:
however, another way is with the group velocity of a wave

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}

and this way can also be thought of as

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}=\frac{\partial E}{\partial p}

with E and p being the particle's energy and momentum respectively.

That is the proper way of defining it. Keep in mind that for any momentum-independent potential:

\frac{\partial E}{\partial p} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p} = \frac{p}{m}

Which is the same thing that Demystifier suggested.

In general, don't forget that Hamiltonian mechanics still works.

\dot{q_i} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}
 
Thanks for answers. I'm wonder what's the proper definition in case of magnetic field?
 
Velocity is just the time derivative of the coordinate vector. If X is the x coordinate, then

V(X) = dX/dt = -i [X,H], the Heisenberg Equation of motion for the x position coordinate. With a conserved NR system, V=P/m, where P is the momentum operator, and m the mass.

The Dirac eq. is not so easy for V; H is linear in momentum, so up to constant factors,V = GAMMA x, the Dirac matrix that multiplies Px in the Hamiltonian.

V/dt=dD/dt is non zero, V does not commute with the free Hamiltonian.

This shows one of the substantial difference between relativistic and non-relativistic QM; the interaction between spatial coords and spin. Dirac in his book QM, gives a good explanation of velocity for the Dirac E.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
739
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
888
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
770
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
977
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K