Velocity of Particles in Quantum Mechanics: Momentum & Computing Mean Values

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the definition of particle velocity in quantum mechanics (QM) and its relationship with momentum. The velocity operator is established as the momentum operator divided by mass. Two methods for computing mean velocity are highlighted: the traditional approach using the velocity operator and the group velocity formula, defined as v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}. Additionally, the implications of magnetic fields and the differences between relativistic and non-relativistic QM are discussed, emphasizing the role of the Hamiltonian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Dirac equation
  • Basic concepts of wave mechanics and group velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Heisenberg Equation of motion in quantum mechanics
  • Study the role of the Hamiltonian in quantum systems
  • Explore the differences between relativistic and non-relativistic quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the applications of group velocity in wave mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the dynamics of particles and the mathematical frameworks governing their behavior.

paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
How do we define veliocity of a particle in QM?
How it's related to the momentum.
Are there any ways to cimpute quickly mean value of veliocity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
one way is still with the same old fashion \bf{u} :)

however, another way is with the group velocity of a wave

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}

and this way can also be thought of as

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}=\frac{\partial E}{\partial p}

with E and p being the particle's energy and momentum respectively.

for more information on this go to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Group_velocity"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The velocity operator is the momentum operator divided by mass.
 
Hi.

Demystifier said:
The velocity operator is the momentum operator divided by mass.

Yes, you may define velocity as this. However in case you think of Zitterbewegung motion, velocity has nothing to do with momentum and its magnitude is c, velocity of light.

Regards.
 
jfy4 said:
however, another way is with the group velocity of a wave

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}

and this way can also be thought of as

v_{g}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}=\frac{\partial E}{\partial p}

with E and p being the particle's energy and momentum respectively.

That is the proper way of defining it. Keep in mind that for any momentum-independent potential:

\frac{\partial E}{\partial p} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p} = \frac{p}{m}

Which is the same thing that Demystifier suggested.

In general, don't forget that Hamiltonian mechanics still works.

\dot{q_i} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial p_i}
 
Thanks for answers. I'm wonder what's the proper definition in case of magnetic field?
 
Velocity is just the time derivative of the coordinate vector. If X is the x coordinate, then

V(X) = dX/dt = -i [X,H], the Heisenberg Equation of motion for the x position coordinate. With a conserved NR system, V=P/m, where P is the momentum operator, and m the mass.

The Dirac eq. is not so easy for V; H is linear in momentum, so up to constant factors,V = GAMMA x, the Dirac matrix that multiplies Px in the Hamiltonian.

V/dt=dD/dt is non zero, V does not commute with the free Hamiltonian.

This shows one of the substantial difference between relativistic and non-relativistic QM; the interaction between spatial coords and spin. Dirac in his book QM, gives a good explanation of velocity for the Dirac E.

Regards,
Reilly Atkinson
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
986
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
868
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K