Velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and around Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter supernova88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Velocity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the velocity required for a cannonball to land at various distances around the Earth, specifically 1/4, 1/2, and a full circumference. The calculations begin with a simplified model where the Earth is treated as a flat surface with a circumference of 40,000,000 meters. Key findings include that a cannonball must travel approximately 800,000 m/s to land 40,000,000 m away after freefalling from a height of 10 km, which is significantly higher than the orbital velocity of 17,000 mi/h. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of teaching these concepts in a way that is accessible to students, suggesting practical examples and relatable velocities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic concepts of gravitational acceleration (g ≈ 10 m/s²)
  • Familiarity with freefall and projectile motion
  • Knowledge of circular motion and orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the calculations for projectile motion using the formula v = sqrt(g * R_E) for different heights.
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on projectile trajectories.
  • Investigate the concept of centripetal acceleration and its application in satellite motion.
  • Study real-world examples of orbital velocities for various satellites and their implications.
USEFUL FOR

Teachers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding gravitational effects and projectile motion in a simplified context. This discussion is particularly beneficial for educators looking to convey complex concepts in an accessible manner.

supernova88
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Member advised to use the provided formatting template when starting a new thread in a homework forum.
Hi, I'm actually a teacher presently undergoing gravitation and circular motion with my students, and ran into a problem I forgot how to think through. I'm trying to explain Newton's cannonball thought process (shoot a cannonball fast enough off a mountain and it will circle the earth), and determine the velocity v from a particular height. I completely understand the rationale behind v=sqrt(G x mass of Earth / radius), but my students aren't ready for that *yet*. Instead I wanted to simplify things and pretend Earth is a long flat surface (I know it isn't) where its circumference is its distance which is d = 40,000,000 m. We would then find the velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and all the way "around" earth.

Assuming a mountain is 10 km or 10,000 m tall, freefall should take roughly 44.7 seconds if g ~10 m/s^2, and rounding up we get 50 s (yes I know I'm taking a lot of shortcuts but at this level it's necessary). Anyway, the obvious answer is that for a cannonball to fall 10 km and land 40,000,000 m away it would need to travel v = 40,000,000/50 = 800,000 m/s, which equals nearly 2 million mi/h. This is way bigger than the known orbital velocity of things like the space station which are around 17,000 mi/h.

Even traveling half way around Earth (20,000,000 m) the velocity is basically 1 million mi/h.

I did have some luck when instead I looked at a quarter of the distance around Earth and thought of it like a triangle, where the vertical leg (say, facing north) is Earth's radius plus the mountain, and the horizontal leg (east) is Earth's radius. The height the cannonball falls therefore 6,370 km + 10 km, and freefall takes 1128.7 s. Landing 6,370,000 m away to the east, it should go - approximately - 5,643.7 m/s = 20,317.2 km/h = 12,700 mi/h. This isn't quite 17,000 mi/h, but a step in the right direction.

Anyway, that's a long winded way of asking how I can simply demonstrate a cannonball's velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and all the way around the earth.

Thanks so much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I just realized the error in my thinking ... orbits don't take 50 seconds!

I'm still curious for some simple ways to find the velocity it takes to land 1/4, 1/2, and 1 whole circle around the Earth. Thanks.
 
Your ##g## is permanently pointing in the same direction.
real ##g## for an orbit [edit] a circular orbit is permanently pointing perpendicular to the trajectory.
Makes a difference !

THere should be a better way to bring in Newton's cannonball, but I can't oversee what resources there are available.

I wouldn't dream of misleading my students in the way you propose -- too much risk of confusing average students (and losing your credibility with the bright ones !).

But then again, I don't teach :rolleyes: .
 
Last edited:
Thanks, BvU, I'm starting to think I'm over reaching with this problem and, yes, making too many assumptions. However now I just want to know what the right answer is for myself. Thanks for the insight that g is tangential!
 
You might be better off to use numbers that the students can wrap their minds around. Start with a building 100 meters tall, and throw a baseball at 30 meters per second, while emphasizing that "we are ignoring air resistance". Calculate the distance and show with a sketch. Point out that this is roughly the velocity that a good pitcher can throw a baseball.

Then 1000 m/sec for a high velocity rifle for two cases: flat earth, and round earth. Show the trajectory on a diagram with both a flat and curved earth.

Then 7800 m/sec for a science fiction gun. Show the intersection with a flat earth, and how it never hits a round earth.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
If your class knows about centripetal acceleration, you can calculate for them the speed ##v## of a satellite at a grazing orbit around the Earth using ##a_C=g=v^2/R_E##, where ##R_{Earth}##. That should open the door to estimating the time to any point on the surface of the Earth assuming a circular trajectory of an object in free fall.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
926
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K