Velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and around Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter supernova88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of gravitational motion and circular orbits, specifically focusing on the velocity required for a cannonball to land at various distances around the Earth. The original poster seeks to simplify the explanation of Newton's cannonball thought experiment for students who are not yet familiar with advanced physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to calculate the velocity needed for a cannonball to travel 1/4, 1/2, and a full circle around the Earth, questioning the assumptions made in the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of various methods and assumptions, with some participants suggesting alternative scenarios and calculations. The discussion reflects a mix of curiosity and concern about the appropriateness of the original poster's simplifications for their students.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of considering realistic numbers and scenarios that students can understand, as well as the implications of ignoring factors like air resistance. There is also mention of the need to clarify the difference between gravitational acceleration and centripetal acceleration in the context of orbits.

supernova88
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Member advised to use the provided formatting template when starting a new thread in a homework forum.
Hi, I'm actually a teacher presently undergoing gravitation and circular motion with my students, and ran into a problem I forgot how to think through. I'm trying to explain Newton's cannonball thought process (shoot a cannonball fast enough off a mountain and it will circle the earth), and determine the velocity v from a particular height. I completely understand the rationale behind v=sqrt(G x mass of Earth / radius), but my students aren't ready for that *yet*. Instead I wanted to simplify things and pretend Earth is a long flat surface (I know it isn't) where its circumference is its distance which is d = 40,000,000 m. We would then find the velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and all the way "around" earth.

Assuming a mountain is 10 km or 10,000 m tall, freefall should take roughly 44.7 seconds if g ~10 m/s^2, and rounding up we get 50 s (yes I know I'm taking a lot of shortcuts but at this level it's necessary). Anyway, the obvious answer is that for a cannonball to fall 10 km and land 40,000,000 m away it would need to travel v = 40,000,000/50 = 800,000 m/s, which equals nearly 2 million mi/h. This is way bigger than the known orbital velocity of things like the space station which are around 17,000 mi/h.

Even traveling half way around Earth (20,000,000 m) the velocity is basically 1 million mi/h.

I did have some luck when instead I looked at a quarter of the distance around Earth and thought of it like a triangle, where the vertical leg (say, facing north) is Earth's radius plus the mountain, and the horizontal leg (east) is Earth's radius. The height the cannonball falls therefore 6,370 km + 10 km, and freefall takes 1128.7 s. Landing 6,370,000 m away to the east, it should go - approximately - 5,643.7 m/s = 20,317.2 km/h = 12,700 mi/h. This isn't quite 17,000 mi/h, but a step in the right direction.

Anyway, that's a long winded way of asking how I can simply demonstrate a cannonball's velocity to land 1/4, 1/2, and all the way around the earth.

Thanks so much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So I just realized the error in my thinking ... orbits don't take 50 seconds!

I'm still curious for some simple ways to find the velocity it takes to land 1/4, 1/2, and 1 whole circle around the Earth. Thanks.
 
Your ##g## is permanently pointing in the same direction.
real ##g## for an orbit [edit] a circular orbit is permanently pointing perpendicular to the trajectory.
Makes a difference !

THere should be a better way to bring in Newton's cannonball, but I can't oversee what resources there are available.

I wouldn't dream of misleading my students in the way you propose -- too much risk of confusing average students (and losing your credibility with the bright ones !).

But then again, I don't teach :rolleyes: .
 
Last edited:
Thanks, BvU, I'm starting to think I'm over reaching with this problem and, yes, making too many assumptions. However now I just want to know what the right answer is for myself. Thanks for the insight that g is tangential!
 
You might be better off to use numbers that the students can wrap their minds around. Start with a building 100 meters tall, and throw a baseball at 30 meters per second, while emphasizing that "we are ignoring air resistance". Calculate the distance and show with a sketch. Point out that this is roughly the velocity that a good pitcher can throw a baseball.

Then 1000 m/sec for a high velocity rifle for two cases: flat earth, and round earth. Show the trajectory on a diagram with both a flat and curved earth.

Then 7800 m/sec for a science fiction gun. Show the intersection with a flat earth, and how it never hits a round earth.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
If your class knows about centripetal acceleration, you can calculate for them the speed ##v## of a satellite at a grazing orbit around the Earth using ##a_C=g=v^2/R_E##, where ##R_{Earth}##. That should open the door to estimating the time to any point on the surface of the Earth assuming a circular trajectory of an object in free fall.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K