Venus possibly habitable for billions of years: Newscientist.com

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Venus Years
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the potential habitability of Venus, particularly in light of new research suggesting that Earth-like conditions may have existed on the planet for billions of years. Participants explore various aspects of Venus's climate, geological features, and the implications for life, as well as the challenges of studying the planet's harsh environment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Venus may have had pleasant conditions for life for up to two billion years after its formation.
  • There is a question about whether electrical storms on Venus could potentially spark life, though others argue that the extreme temperatures make survival unlikely.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of reversing Venus's runaway greenhouse effect, with one proposing that thick cloud cover might eventually block enough sunlight to cool the planet.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of landing probes on Venus due to its extreme temperatures and acidic atmosphere, with references to past Russian landers that successfully operated under such conditions.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the materials used for probes, questioning their ability to withstand Venus's harsh environment.
  • There is a discussion about the uniform temperature across Venus and its geological features, with participants noting the need for more hypotheses to explain these phenomena.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the habitability of Venus and the implications of its climate and geological features. There is no consensus on whether life could exist or whether the greenhouse effect can be reversed, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of studying Venus's environment.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding Venus's climate and geological features, noting that many aspects remain unexplained and that existing hypotheses may not fully account for observed phenomena.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying planetary science, astrobiology, and climate dynamics, as well as individuals curious about the geological and atmospheric characteristics of Venus.

Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,664
The hellish climate of Venus may have arisen far more recently than previously supposed, suggests new research. If so, pleasant Earth-like conditions probably persisted for two billion years after the planet's birth - plenty of time for life to have developed

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994136
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
venus has a lot of electrical storms right? Could that spark life now
 
Originally posted by The Grimmus
venus has a lot of electrical storms right? Could that spark life now
Not unless there's any life that can survive 700F++ temperatures...

More to the point, is there anything at all that could reverse Venus's runaway greenhouse effect?
 
Originally posted by phi1978
Not unless there's any life that can survive 700F++ temperatures...

More to the point, is there anything at all that could reverse Venus's runaway greenhouse effect?

I've been thinking about that, and it seems possible. You can see how that greenhouse effect has covered the Venusion sky with a white, highly reflective cloud layer, right? This cloud cover is sausing the heat to be trapped, which is, in turn, causing more carbon to be released from the rocks. But this same cloud layer is also blocking sunlight from getting in, actually keeping heat out of the system. It's just that under current conditions very little heat is needed to perpetuate the greenhouse effect. Nevertheless, some energy input is still required.

If at some point the cloud cover becomes so thick that the amount of heat being allowed into the system is not adequate to sustain the runaway effect, temperatures could drop rather drastically (in geological terms). It would be a lot like a nuclear winter.
 
Originally posted by phi1978
Not unless there's any life that can survive 700F++ temperatures...


Also the acid in the atmosphere.
 
Originally posted by phi1978
more to the point, is there anything at all that could reverse Venus's runaway greenhouse effect?

Carl Sagan discussed this a bit in his book "Pale Blue Dot". In short, the answer is no...or at least not without causing a lot of havoc to the planet (e.g., bombarding it with many huge asteroids to blow off much of the atmosphere).

I recommend reading the book...but if I find the time, I'll try to post a summary of the considerations.
 
Thanks for the link, Ivan. It will be interesting to see how this idea is received.
 
forgive me for bluntness and inspit of how inteligent NASA officals are how could you parachute a prob onto venus with all that "acid and 700++" temperature i know there very resourceful i just highly doubt a material such as that exsists just thought id throw something that poped out in my mind

Thx
 
Originally posted by blu3man
forgive me for bluntness and inspit of how inteligent NASA officals are how could you parachute a prob onto venus with all that "acid and 700++" temperature i know there very resourceful i just highly doubt a material such as that exsists just thought id throw something that poped out in my mind

Thx
I don't know about NASA, but the Russians put not one but two landers on Venus, back in the 1980s (Venera 13 and Venera 14). They used parachutes to slow their descent.

Check out this link (and more by googling on "Venera lander"):
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog?sc=1981-106D
 
  • #10
All I am saying is use your brain i don't care what the government is telling you , do you honestly think in the 80's or even now a fabric parachute could withstand that to land something in one peace just sends up red flags in my mind that maybe it isn't nearly as bad as they say
 
  • #11
I think the basic thread her was on the enigmatic features of Venus. One of my favorite mysteries.

That article is a nice hypothesis about Venus climate and the alleged wet greenhouse, but only climate.

Could greenhouse effect explain an almost uniform temperature on poles and equator, back side and front side of the planet of about 730K?

There are many curious things on the surface of Venus (exceptional long thin lava flows, crab and dome volcanoes, heat cracks or grabens?) with no clear explanations.

Then we have the rotation stop, explaned by gravity interaction between the atmosphere and the sun(Correia et al) but not sufficient enough to explain the initial stage and dependent on the emerging time of the current atmosphere.

Working on the explanation of all the strange features with only one hypothesis.
 
  • #12
Could greenhouse effect explain an almost uniform temperature on poles and equator, back side and front side of the planet of about 730K?

How about if you included the facts about Venus' very curious rotation and its axial tilt.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K