Verify this result when ## n=10 ##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion verifies the equation ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ## for ## n=10 ##. The divisors of 10 are identified as ## d\in\{1, 2, 5, 10\} ##, and the values of the divisor functions ## \sigma_{0} ## and ## \sigma_{2} ## are calculated. Specifically, ## \sigma_{0}(1)=1, \sigma_{0}(2)=2, \sigma_{0}(5)=2, \sigma_{0}(10)=4 ##, and ## \sigma_{2}(10)=130 ##. The final verification shows that both sides of the equation yield the same result, confirming the validity of the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of divisor functions, specifically ## \sigma_{0} ## and ## \sigma_{2} ##.
  • Familiarity with number theory concepts, including divisors and their properties.
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical notation and LaTeX formatting.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving sums and products of integers.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the Möbius function and its applications in number theory.
  • Explore convolution operations in the context of divisor functions.
  • Study advanced properties of divisor functions and their relationships.
  • Investigate additional examples of verifying divisor function equations for different values of n.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, students studying advanced mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties of divisor functions and their applications in proofs.

Math100
Messages
817
Reaction score
229
Homework Statement
Prove that ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##, and verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Relevant Equations
None.
Proof:

Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})&=(N^{2}\ast u)\ast (N^{2}\ast u) \text{ since } \sigma_{2}(n)=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\cdot 1=N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=(u\ast N^{2})\ast (N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\ast N^{2})\ast u\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\sigma_{0})\ast u \text{ since } N^{2}\ast N^{2}=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}(\frac{n^{2}}{d^{2}})=n^{2}\sum_{d\mid n}1=N^{2}\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast (u\ast u) \text{ since } u\ast u=\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast \sigma_{0}\\
&=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}).\\
\end{align*}
Therefore, ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##.
Now we will verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Consider the divisors ## d\in\left \{ 1, 2, 5, 10 \right \} ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid 10}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{d})&\stackrel{?}{=}\sum_{d\mid 10}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{d})
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
&\sigma_{2}(1)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{1})+\sigma_{2}(2)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{2})+\sigma_{2}(5)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{5})+\sigma_{2}(10)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{10})\\
&\stackrel{?}{=}1^{2}\sigma_{0}(1)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{1})+2^{2}\sigma_{0}(2)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{2})+5^{2}\sigma_{0}(5)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{5})+10^{2}\sigma_{0}(10)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{10}).
\end{align*}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I was thinking ## \sigma_{0}(1)=1, \sigma_{0}(2)=2, \sigma_{0}(5)=2, \sigma_{0}(10)=4 ##. But what should ## \sigma_{2}(1), \sigma_{2}(2), \sigma_{2}(5), \sigma_{2}(10) ## be?
 
Math100 said:
Homework Statement:: Prove that ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##, and verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Relevant Equations:: None.

Proof:

Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})&=(N^{2}\ast u)\ast (N^{2}\ast u) \text{ since } \sigma_{2}(n)=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\cdot 1=N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=(u\ast N^{2})\ast (N^{2}\ast u)\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\ast N^{2})\ast u\\
&=u\ast (N^{2}\sigma_{0})\ast u \text{ since } N^{2}\ast N^{2}=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}(\frac{n^{2}}{d^{2}})=n^{2}\sum_{d\mid n}1=N^{2}\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast (u\ast u) \text{ since } u\ast u=\sigma_{0} \\
&=N^{2}\sigma_{0}\ast \sigma_{0}\\
&=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}).\\
\end{align*}
Therefore, ## \sum_{d\mid n}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{n}{d})=\sum_{d\mid n}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{n}{d}) ##.
Now we will verify this result when ## n=10 ##.
Consider the divisors ## d\in\left \{ 1, 2, 5, 10 \right \} ##.
Observe that
\begin{align*}
\sum_{d\mid 10}\sigma_{2}(d)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{d})&\stackrel{?}{=}\sum_{d\mid 10}d^{2}\sigma_{0}(d)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{d})
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
&\sigma_{2}(1)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{1})+\sigma_{2}(2)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{2})+\sigma_{2}(5)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{5})+\sigma_{2}(10)\sigma_{2}(\frac{10}{10})\\
&\stackrel{?}{=}1^{2}\sigma_{0}(1)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{1})+2^{2}\sigma_{0}(2)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{2})+5^{2}\sigma_{0}(5)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{5})+10^{2}\sigma_{0}(10)\sigma_{0}(\frac{10}{10}).
\end{align*}
I corrected the LaTeX. I cannot check the proof since I still don't know what ##N## and ##u## are.

The equation where I added a question mark needs to be checked, i.e. you have to calculate the sigma function values and add them. We have
$$
\sigma_k(n) =\sum_{d|n}d^k
$$
This means that ##\sigma_0## is the number of divisors, e.g. ##\sigma_0(10)= |\{1,2,5,10\}|=4.## For ##\sigma_2## we have to calculate e.g.
$$
\sigma_2(10) =\sum_{d|10}d^2=\sum_{d\in \{1,2,5,10\}} d^2 =1^2+2^2+5^2+10^2=130
$$

Or you look up the values in the table here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teilerfunktion
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
fresh_42 said:
I corrected the LaTeX. I cannot check the proof since I still don't know what ##N## and ##u## are.

The equation where I added a question mark needs to be checked, i.e. you have to calculate the sigma function values and add them. We have
$$
\sigma_k(n) =\sum_{d|n}d^k
$$
This means that ##\sigma_0## is the number of divisors, e.g. ##\sigma_0(10)= |\{1,2,5,10\}|=4.## For ##\sigma_2## we have to calculate e.g.
$$
\sigma_2(10) =\sum_{d|10}d^2=\sum_{d\in \{1,2,5,10\}} d^2 =1^2+2^2+5^2+10^2=130
$$

Or you look up the values in the table here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teilerfunktion
It's okay, you don't necessarily need to check the proof. I just wanted to know how to compute those values at the end, the verification part.
 
Math100 said:
It's okay, you don't necessarily need to check the proof. I just wanted to know how to compute those values at the end, the verification part.
The formula looks like a convolution, a variation of
$$
(f\ast g)(n)=\sum_{k\in D} f(k) g(n/k).
$$
Would be nice to understand the details, i.e. to see the proof why the divisor formulas can be written that way.
 
  • Like
Likes Math100
I think I have found it in a book. Möbius function seems to be the key word.
 
  • Informative
Likes Math100
fresh_42 said:
I think I have found it in a book. Möbius function seems to be the key word.
What book?
 
Math100 said:
What book?
A book on number theory. It's been a long time since I last time had a look.
 
fresh_42 said:
A book on number theory. It's been a long time since I last time had a look.
I see. And the results when ## n=10 ## match each other in the equation. It's ## 130+130+130+130=4+16+100+400=520 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K