Verifying Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinate System

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying whether the transformations u_1=2x-y, u_2=x+2y, and u_3=3z form an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system. Participants are trying to demonstrate that the dot product of different coordinate vectors u_i and u_j equals zero, indicating orthogonality. A key point raised is the distinction between scalar values and unit vectors, which affects the calculation of the dot product. The initial calculation shows that u_1 and u_2 do not yield a zero dot product, suggesting they may not be orthogonal. Clarification on the correct representation of the vectors is essential for accurate verification.
latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
For the transformation
u_1=2x-y
u_2=x+2y
u_3=3z

verify that the u_i form an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas? how do you show ui & uj are orthogonal when j does not equal i
 
show dot product is 0.
if u_1=(2x,-y,0),u_2=(x,2y,0) then
u_1 \cdot u_2 = 2x^2 -2y^2 \neq 0 though
 
Are you sure that the vectors aren't supposed to be:
\vec{u_1}=2\hat{x}-\hat{y}
\vec{u_2}=\hat{x}+2\hat{y}
\vec{u_2}=3\hat{z}

...there is a big difference between the scalar x and the unit vector \hat{x}!:wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
823
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K