Verifying Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinate System

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around verifying whether a given transformation defines an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system. The subject area includes vector calculus and coordinate transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore how to demonstrate the orthogonality of the coordinate system by considering the dot product of the transformed vectors. Questions arise regarding the correct interpretation of the transformation and the distinction between scalar and vector representations.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, with participants questioning the assumptions made about the vectors involved. Some guidance is offered regarding the method of using the dot product to check orthogonality, but discrepancies in vector representation have been noted, indicating a lack of consensus on the correct approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential confusion between scalar variables and their corresponding unit vector representations, which may affect the verification process.

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
For the transformation
u_1=2x-y
u_2=x+2y
u_3=3z

verify that the u_i form an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system
 
Physics news on Phys.org
any ideas? how do you show ui & uj are orthogonal when j does not equal i
 
show dot product is 0.
if u_1=(2x,-y,0),u_2=(x,2y,0) then
u_1 \cdot u_2 = 2x^2 -2y^2 \neq 0 though
 
Are you sure that the vectors aren't supposed to be:
\vec{u_1}=2\hat{x}-\hat{y}
\vec{u_2}=\hat{x}+2\hat{y}
\vec{u_2}=3\hat{z}

...there is a big difference between the scalar x and the unit vector \hat{x}!:wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
1K