Verifying That Diamond Is More Stable At Certain Conditions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around verifying the stability of diamond compared to graphite under specific pressure conditions, particularly at approximately 15 kbars. The original poster attempts to utilize Gibbs free energy calculations to demonstrate this stability difference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between Gibbs free energy and stability, questioning the values used for volume and Gibbs free energy of formation. There is an exploration of assumptions regarding volume changes under pressure and the interpretation of reference data from the textbook.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants clarifying values and questioning assumptions. Some participants have provided guidance on interpreting the Gibbs free energy values, while others are seeking further clarification on the reference data used.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the volume values for diamond and graphite, as well as the specific Gibbs free energy values referenced in the textbook. Participants are also discussing the conversion between pressure units (Pascals to Bar).

Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Verify that diamond becomes more stable than graphite at approximately 15 kbars



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So, I understand that to show one substance is more stable than another at particular environmental conditions, I just have to show that the one with a lower Gibbs free energy is more stable.

In the section, the formula \left( \frac{\partial G}{\partial P} \right)_{T,N} = V. Since the partial derivative is given approximately by \frac{\partial G}{\partial P} = \frac{\Delta G}{\Delta P}, I can write \frac{\Delta G}{\Delta P} = V.

In the back of the textbook I am using is a table containing the Gibbs free energy of formation of substances at at temperature of T=293 K and a pressure of P = 1 bar, call it G_1 Using this information, I figured I could obtain the Gibbs free energy at P = 15 kbar, call it G_{15}:

\frac{\Delta G}{\Delta P} = V \implies

\Delta G = \Delta P V \implies

G_{15} = \Delta P V + G_1.

Now, if we assume that the change in volume of the substance is negligible as the pressure changes from P = 1 bar to P = 15 kbar, which is an assumption the author of the textbook uses, then the formula above is applicable. The volume of diamond at T=293 and P=1 bar is 5.31 x 10^-6. Calculating the Gibbs free energy at 15 kbars of the diamond:

G_{15,D} = (15 \times 10^{3}~bar -1~bar)(5.31 \times 10^{-6} ~m^3)+ 2.900 \times 10^{3} ~J = 2900 ~J

And for graphite, where the volume is 3.42 x 10^-6

G_{15,G} = (15 \times 10^{3}~bar -1~bar)(3.42 \times 10^{-6}) + 0 = 0.0513 ~J.

Clearly the Gibbs free energy is less for graphite. What did I do incorrectly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where does the 3.42 come from? You seem to have a smaller volume for the graphite than for the diamond, which is clearly wrong.
 
Whoops...I read it incorrectly. The diamond should have the volume of 3.42. But this still does not change the fact that the Gibbs free energy of graphite is much smaller than that of diamond's.
 
ok, so next I question the G1 values. What exactly does it say in the back of the book, and how did you use that to calculate the G1s?
 
I uploaded a screen shot of the reference data that I am using, and the paragraph that precedes it. Does this answer your question regarding the G1's, or do you require more information?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (11).jpg
    Screenshot (11).jpg
    72.7 KB · Views: 509
  • Screenshot (12).jpg
    Screenshot (12).jpg
    48.9 KB · Views: 478
Okay, I think I understand now. Number that is closer to being negative is the substance that is less stable. Therefore, the graphite would be less stable at these particular environmental conditions.
 
How many Pascals to the Bar?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K