Very Basic questions on bra-ket notation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alexis21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bra-ket Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the fundamentals of bra-ket notation in quantum mechanics. A ket |φ⟩ typically describes a state in a complex vector space Cⁿ, while a bra-ket ⟨ψ|φ⟩ is dimensionless, representing an inner product. The matrix representation of an operator, denoted as ⟨φ_n|Ĥ|φ_m⟩, involves understanding how the operator Ĥ acts on the state |φ_m⟩. The relationship between matrices and linear operators is crucial for grasping these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex vector spaces (Cⁿ)
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces
  • Basic knowledge of linear operators in quantum mechanics
  • Concept of Hilbert spaces in quantum theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hilbert spaces in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the role of linear operators in quantum state transformations
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of inner products and their applications
  • Investigate the matrix representation of quantum operators in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students and enthusiasts of quantum mechanics, particularly those seeking to understand the mathematical framework of bra-ket notation and its applications in quantum theory.

Alexis21
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

i am a beginner in quantum mechanics and i have those basic questions on the bra-ket notation:

Which dimension has a ket | \phi > describing a state normally? Maybe\quad C ^n?

Which dimension has a bra-ket <\psi | \phi >then? Maybe \quad C?

How do you get the matrix representation of an operator in general? I have been reading something like this: <\phi_n |\hat{A}| \phi_m >? I think i have to figure out then, how A works on phi_m but what to do next?

Thanks for helping
 
Physics news on Phys.org
See post #3 here for the relationship between matrices and linear operators. This old post explains bra-ket notation.

What do you mean by "dimension"? Do you mean in the sense of units? I have never seen a reason to assign them a unit, so I would consider them dimensionless. Note that |\langle\alpha|\beta\rangle|^2 must be dimensionless since it's supposed to be interpreted as a probability.
 
A vector or a scalar has no dimension, a space of vectors has. Yes, if phi_n is a set of vectors which form a basis in a (pre-)Hilbert space, then \langle \phi_n, A \phi_n\rangle is a matrix element, a complex number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K