Very Very Basic Numeracy Question - I'm Having a Dumb Moment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Enemy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moment
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Doppler shift and its implications for frequency measurements. The original poster presents a question regarding the fluctuation of temperature (T) in relation to frequency accuracy, specifically comparing frequencies to a precision of 1 part in 10^15.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between frequency differences and temperature fluctuations, questioning the implications of the precision level. There is a focus on understanding the equation presented and its dimensional consistency.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, seeking clarification on the relationship between frequency and temperature. Some have offered insights into the nature of the frequency difference, while others are questioning the assumptions made in the original equation.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the appropriateness of the formula used and the implications of using constants in the context of the problem. Participants are also addressing potential misunderstandings related to the terminology and units involved.

Physics Enemy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Basically the question is about doppler shift. The formula is:
(f2 - f1)/f1 = -kT ; f1 = Freq in object rest frame, f2 = Freq in lab frame

The Q: Often, frequencies are compared to 1 part in 10^15. In order to make use of this level of accuracy, to what extent can T fluctuate?

I think I'm having a serious dumb moment. Does this mean (f2 - f1) is at least 1/10^15? i.e.) We can't discern less than that? But then what do I do; are they expecting a % error?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics Enemy said:
Hi,

Basically the question is about doppler shift. The formula is:
(f2 - f1)/f1 = -kT ; f1 = Freq in object rest frame, f2 = Freq in lab frame
There is a problem with your equation, since the units do not match. The left side is unitless, while kT has units of energy.

The Q: Often, frequencies are compared to 1 part in 10^15. In order to make use of this level of accuracy, to what extent can T fluctuate?

I think I'm having a serious dumb moment. Does this mean (f2 - f1) is at least 1/10^15? i.e.) We can't discern less than that? But then what do I do; are they expecting a % error?
It means |f2-f1| is comparable to f1/1015, or f2/1015.
 
Redbelly98 said:
There is a problem with your equation, since the units do not match. The left side is unitless, while kT has units of energy.
Sorry - The k is just a constant I put in, it's actually various quantities bundled together. So the dimensions do turn out to be correct. I just wanted to simplify and focus on the Q.

Redbelly98 said:
It means |f2-f1| is comparable to f1/1015, or f2/1015.
This is the key point and thanks for your answer. Could you perhaps expand on this? At the moment it just seems a little random to me and I don't understand it in laymans terms. And why is it one or the other (f1/10^15 'or' f2/10^15) ?

Thanks!
 
Physics Enemy said:
Sorry - The k is just a constant I put in, it's actually various quantities bundled together. So the dimensions do turn out to be correct. I just wanted to simplify and focus on the Q.
Okay, that makes more sense. (The letter k is also used for Boltzmann's constant, which often appears in equations with temperature in the form kT, so I wrongly assumed you meant that.)

This is the key point and thanks for your answer. Could you perhaps expand on this? At the moment it just seems a little random to me and I don't understand it in laymans terms. And why is it one or the other (f1/10^15 'or' f2/10^15) ?

Thanks!
Well, in layman's terms, it means the difference |f2-f1| is a lot smaller than f1. How much less? Well, it's 1/1015 times smaller than f1. We could also say that f2 is 0.999999999999999*f1, or maybe it's 1.000000000000001*f1 -- depending on whether f1 or f2 is larger than the other. Either way, it doesn't matter whether |f2-f1| is being compared to f1 or f2, because f1 and f2 are so very nearly equal to each other.

Or, put another way, the ratio

|f2 - f1| / f1 = 1/1015
 
Redbelly98 said:
Okay, that makes more sense. (The letter k is also used for Boltzmann's constant, which often appears in equations with temperature in the form kT, so I wrongly assumed you meant that.)
Yes you're right, it was sloppy of me. :)


Redbelly98 said:
Well, in layman's terms, it means the difference |f2-f1| is a lot smaller than f1. How much less? Well, it's 1/1015 times smaller than f1. We could also say that f2 is 0.999999999999999*f1, or maybe it's 1.000000000000001*f1 -- depending on whether f1 or f2 is larger than the other. Either way, it doesn't matter whether |f2-f1| is being compared to f1 or f2, because f1 and f2 are so very nearly equal to each other.

Or, put another way, the ratio

|f2 - f1| / f1 = 1/1015
Thanks, I'm happy with this. So therefore:

1/10^15 = Constant * (Variation in T)
Variation in T = Some Number

So it's not a %, just +/- this number. Correct?
 
Yes, correct.
 
Thank you RedBelly. :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K