Vibration: Transmissibility ratio sign change when damping is equal to zero

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the transmissibility ratio equation, specifically the conditions under which to take the positive or negative square root when damping is zero. The transmissibility ratio (T.R.) is generally considered a positive value, but the negative root is applicable when the ratio r (the natural frequency to excitation frequency) is greater than one. Participants clarify that r indicates how close the driving frequency is to the resonant frequency and does not directly relate to damping. The conversation reflects some frustration with the topic, indicating a lack of interest in the class material. Understanding the conditions for the roots is essential for accurately applying the transmissibility ratio in vibration analysis.
Pipsqueakalchemist
Messages
138
Reaction score
20
So for the transmissibility ratio equation, after doing a lot of questions when damping is zero and I have to take the square root of the denominator. Some questions take the positive root (1-r^2) while for other questions the solution takes the negative root (r^2-1). Can someone explain when we take the positive or negative root please and thank you
 

Attachments

  • 6432EE0F-4355-4F33-B274-615223E5F9D0.jpeg
    6432EE0F-4355-4F33-B274-615223E5F9D0.jpeg
    30.5 KB · Views: 187
Engineering news on Phys.org
The T.R. is a ratio of force magnitudes and is generally taken as a positive value. So the negative root is taken when r>1.
 
It looks like Pipsqueak is no longer with us... Nevertheless, r in the above equation is the ratio between natural frequency and excitation frequency (ω/ωn). It's a measure of how close the driving frequency is to the resonant frequency, and doesn't provide any explicit information on the damping.
 
onatirec said:
It looks like Pipsqueak is no longer with us... Nevertheless, r in the above equation is the ratio between natural frequency and excitation frequency (ω/ωn). It's a measure of how close the driving frequency is to the resonant frequency, and doesn't provide any explicit information on the damping.
Yea I stopped caring about that class so it’s whatever
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top