MHB Vibrations of a Hanging Chain: Modeling Tension with PDEs

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on modeling the vibrations of a hanging chain using partial differential equations (PDEs). The key point is to derive the tension at a point along the chain in equilibrium, expressed as τ(x) = ρ · g · x, where ρ is the mass density and g is gravitational acceleration. The equilibrium condition considers the balance between the downward gravitational force and the upward tension. Participants are encouraged to build on this foundation to further analyze the system. Understanding these forces is essential for solving the problem effectively.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

I am having trouble with how to start with one part of the question:
"In this exercise, we derived the PDE that models the vibrations of a hanging chain of length $L$. For convenience, the x-axis placed vertically with the positive direction pointing upward, and the fixed end of the chain is fastened at $x=L$. Let $u(x,y)$ denote the deflection of the chain, we assume is taking place in $(x,u)$-plane, as in the figure, and let $\rho$ denote its mass density (mass per unit length).
(Here is where I have trouble starting)
Part a:
Show that, in the equilibrium position, the tension at a point $x$ is $\tau(x)=\rho \cdot g \cdot x$, where g is the gravitational acceleration.

Thanks,
Cbarker1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Cbarker1,

In the equilibrium position the chain is hanging straight down. At a point $x$ along the chain there are two forces we must consider: (i) the weight of the chain pulling the point down via gravity and (ii) the tension at $x$ pulling up. The equilibrium equation is then $$\tau(x)-mg=0,$$ where $m$ is the mass of the portion of the chain pulling down at the point $x$. Can you continue from here?
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K