Virginia Tech Shootings: Eyewitness Reports & Updates

  • Thread starter Thread starter robphy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A tragic shooting at Virginia Tech resulted in at least 31 deaths, making it the deadliest campus shooting in U.S. history. The incident involved two separate locations on campus, with reports indicating the shooter may have acted alone. Discussions highlight the role of gun culture and media coverage in perpetuating violence, with some arguing that sensational reporting could inspire future incidents. The conversation also touches on societal attitudes towards masculinity and violence, questioning whether these cultural factors contribute to such tragedies. The motivations behind the shooter's actions remain unclear, emphasizing the need for careful consideration before drawing conclusions.
  • #91
J77 said:
What a terrible, sad incident :frown:

Will lessons be learnt?

I stand by what I said when the Amish shootings took place -- not matter how responsible you are, if you own a gun you're part of the problem; if there's a demand, there will be more guns readily available for crazy, selfish scum.
Totally aggree:approve:

Its capitalism gone wrong, gun ownership. The want for indivudal rights and perceived protection at the expense of the community as a whole. :mad:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #93
A terrible tragedy. :frown:

mattmns said:
Why not at least make an attempt. The gunman is said to have shot over 60 people. What are these people doing? Just sitting around waiting to be shot? I guess it does not make sense why a group of people did not rush him. Yes, he has a gun, but eventually he has to reload (granted that may take only a few seconds), but if a large group of people are rushing this guy, he is going down. Of course I am assuming he is not using an automatic weapon (I think the news said he was using a 9mm).

mattmns, are you for real? I mean, I'd like to see you in such a situation (God forbid, of course!). It's not really a movie situation or something, you know. I believe such things happen about "20 times faster" in real life than in movies, btw.
 
  • #94
mattmns said:
Why not at least make an attempt. The gunman is said to have shot over 60 people. What are these people doing? Just sitting around waiting to be shot? I guess it does not make sense why a group of people did not rush him. Yes, he has a gun, but eventually he has to reload (granted that may take only a few seconds), but if a large group of people are rushing this guy, he is going down. Of course I am assuming he is not using an automatic weapon (I think the news said he was using a 9mm).

This is a classic example of Prisoner's Dillema: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner's_dilemma. In the chart given in Wikipedia, replace stays silent with forms into a group, betrays with stays single, and the rest accordingly (unscathed / wounded / critically wounded / death). Each individual's most appealing choice is to stay still and hope the murderer attacks others. But this is not the most appealing choice for the group as a whole.
 
Last edited:
  • #95
Anttech said:
Totally aggree:approve:

Its capitalism gone wrong, gun ownership. The want for indivudal rights and perceived protection at the expense of the community as a whole. :mad:

Obviously you simply do not understand what this country is about. Individual rights IS the single most important thing we have. I am appalled at the willingness of people to sacrifice rights for imagined safety.



I for one am sure glad that you do not have a vote here.
 
  • #96
Integral said:
Obviously you simply do not understand what this country is about. Individual rights IS the single most important thing we have. I am appalled at the willingness of people to sacrifice rights for imagined safety.



I for one am sure glad that you do not have a vote here.
I know what your country is about, I just don't agree with sacrificing the safety of the community for a totally selfish "right" Even though I understand the concept I don't think it works, yesterday was an example.

Honestly I am sure glad you, don't have a vote here. Selfishness doesn’t have a place in our community.
 
  • #97
Integral said:
<snip>imagined safety.</snip>

Lets focus into this word. Europe is at least twice as big as the USA population wise, Western Europe is about the same size. Now can someone please show me an example of the last time what happened yesterday at a School of learning happening here? ----

Imagined safety is just wrong, it is safer to not have the public armed. That doesn't mean you have to hand in your Guns, but all it means is that *we* live in a safer society than you do. If you are willing to live in a culture that glorifies violence and veers more and more to the Masculine side, then fine. But I object to people trying to make out that a society that has loads of weapons in circulation is a safter place, its not.

That isn't all directed at you Integral, but others here too whom are wanting to make an argument to justify that the American Constitution can NEVER be at fault, when in the context of safety for the community as a whole, it most certainly is at fault. However if you deem your *individual* right of gun ownership more than the safety of others around you so be it… Its your bed, enjoy lying in it. I would be much more worried about the patriot act and things like this encroaching on your Indvidual freedoms than Gun ownership.

Right from the start I stated that this debate is pointless, because American Society is what it is, and won't change. Even if you were to ban guns now, its too late The gene not only is out of the bottle but seems to be part of the ruling party and has charmed the masses :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #98
The shootings now look to be a domestic violence crime. Being a surriver of this crime, it feels to me that the shooter was so mad at his victim that he had to kill her over and over. (Not including the man he shot who was trying to protect her.)
I am thinking how far away from ending this kind of behavior we are, remembering not too long ago talking to a man who admitted to being an abuser and stating "my wife did not seem to mind being hit."
My heart is breaking as myself and so many women, children and males as well, look for ways to recover from the PTSD that results from surriving domestic violence.
thank you.
so sorry.
s
 
  • #99
Anttech said:
I know what your country is about, I just don't agree with sacrificing the safety of the community for a totally selfish "right" Even though I understand the concept I don't think it works, yesterday was an example.

Honestly I am sure glad you, don't have a vote here. Selfishness doesn’t have a place in our community.

The only selfish person is the crazy one going on the killing rampage. You can't honestly be judging an entire country based on the actions of a maniac, can you? Lots of people get killed in car accidents every day too, and the occassional nut job goes out and intentionally runs people over in their car, should we prohibit everyone from owning cars because some nuts use them as weapons? There are people behind bars who have used far more mundane objects as weapons as well...baseball bats, pipes, hammers, scissors, steak knives, beer bottles. Based on your logic, we should prohibit all members of society from owning any of those either because some nuts will use them to hurt other people. We already have too many unnecessary laws based on the "one bad apple spoils the barrel" approach to legislation. Firearms are not just weapons used for killing other people, they are tools that every day citizens do own and use safely and for their intended purpose, just as they might own any number of other tools. People use them to hunt for food, ranchers use them to protect their livestock from predators. Yes, they are a dangerous tool, and like any dangerous tool, should be used with training, and some of the licensing requirements to ensure everyone who owns one has proper training could be tightened up, just as people should go through proper training and licensing to drive a car. That doesn't stop someone who does not have a license from getting in a car and mowing down pedestrians on a sidewalk. It doesn't stop the moron from cutting his own fingers off with a chain saw either, or from killing his buddy while using a nail gun. Wrapping everyone up in bubble wrap and putting them in bare, padded rooms so they can't hurt themselves with anything and not allowing them near anyone else so someone else can't hurt them with anything is not the way to deal with these problems. There are a lot of things that can be lethal when misused, but that doesn't mean they should be prohibited to protect everyone from the idiots and crazies.


People here are acting like this is a common problem happening all over the US, and I think those people watch too many movies and think they are real. As the news has been pointing out, the last time any of this magnitude happened on a college campus was in the 1960s with the bell tower shooter in TX. Someone so deranged as to go on such a killing spree, and with such planning (they are reporting that he had put chains on several of the exits from the engineering building so occupants could not escape) is a vast exception to the norm. We are a huge, densely populated nation with a free press. With so many people in the population, there will be psychos who inflict injury on others, and they will find a way to do it regardless of how many restrictions you put on access to weapons. And, when it happens, the press will report it, and will report it far and wide.

And those from other countries need to understand that the entire basis of this country is that our founders didn't like the way government ran where they came from and wanted something different, and those of us who choose to continue to live here do value our freedoms above all else. We don't want to be just like you. You are as free as your government allows you to be in choosing how your country is run and to demand whatever laws you want to have where you are. Likewise, do NOT tell us what laws we should or shouldn't have or what rights we should or shouldn't have in our own country. It is not selfishness to hold individual rights in the highest regard; it is the best way we know to protect the society as a whole from dictators who would trample the basic rights that are the basis of human dignity.

And, I think it is appalling that people are so busy strumping about on a political platform before the bodies of those killed are even cold, rather than being concerned for the victims and their families, classmates and co-workers. There are still students in the hospital in serious condition, still people on that campus grieving the tragedy, still people trying to piece together the details and motives of what happened.

As for what people should or shouldn't have done to prevent this or stop it sooner, it's far too early to be guessing about that. Facts and evidence still need to be gathered, and the puzzle pieced together. The first reports are not necessarily the most accurate. And, often in cases like this, there is nothing that could have been done. People seem to need to blame other people for not knowing someone was planning something like this, or making it easy to get access to the weapon of their choice, or for not stopping them sooner, but sometimes there are not obvious warning signs, no way to know someone is going to snap, no way to know how they will react, no way to know when, where or how they will do what they do. The only person who could have known and done something to change the course of events was the shooter himself. Pointing fingers and thumping chests isn't going to bring back the dead, or help the living victims recover and move forward. That is where the focus should be right now, in getting their lives pieced back together.
 
  • #100
Anttech said:
Lets focus into this word. Europe is at least twice as big as the USA population wise, Western Europe is about the same size. Now can someone please show me an example of the last time what happened yesterday at a School of learning happening here? ----

Imagined safety is just wrong, it is safer to not have the public armed. That doesn't mean you have to hand in your Guns, but all it means is that *we* live in a safer society than you do. If you are willing to live in a culture that glorifies violence and veers more and more to the Masculine side, then fine. But I object to people trying to make out that a society that has loads of weapons in circulation is a safter place, its not.

That isn't all directed at you Integral, but others here too whom are wanting to make an argument to justify that the American Constitution can NEVER be at fault, when in the context of safety for the community as a whole, it most certainly is at fault. However if you deem your *individual* right of gun ownership more than the safety of others around you so be it… Its your bed, enjoy lying in it. I would be much more worried about the patriot act and things like this encroaching on your Indvidual freedoms than Gun ownership.

Right from the start I stated that this debate is pointless, because American Society is what it is, and won't change. Even if you were to ban guns now, its too late The gene not only is out of the bottle but seems to be part of the ruling party and has charmed the masses :smile:

I agree completely that more guns do not make for a safer society. Guns are inherently dangerous that is understood, but it is a danger I am willing to live with.

Imagined safety because you are in more danger everyday driving to campus then you are from this this type of event. Why do you not address the real dangers of our society then then concentrating on this one minor one. The fact is that the vast majority of gun owners are responsible law abiding citizens.

I would rather look for real solutions rather then applying ineffective band aids.

What is the problem? I believe it is a lack of social responsibility, a quick example is something I noticed on my morning walk yesterday. Some wonderful individual had walked down the sidewalk and snapped a limb off of each recently planted trees. This type of meaningless and pointless act of vandalism is symptomatic of the lack of caring for things which in the worst case turns into mass murder.

Rather then adding more and more laws in futile efforts to legislate morality we need to find a way to TEACH morality and social responsibility. How do you do that? I have no idea.

I am very concerned about the Patriot act but it is the same problem, the govt taking more and more of the individual rights that have made this country what it is.

PS: My spell checks would go a lot faster if you would spell check. :smile:
 
  • #101
Integral said:
Obviously you simply do not understand what this country is about. Individual rights IS the single most important thing we have. I am appalled at the willingness of people to sacrifice rights for imagined safety.

I for one am sure glad that you do not have a vote here.

When does the right of one individual over-ride the rights of the many he murdered? Get real. The root of the problem lies in giving easy access to dangerous weapons to any dog & its aunty.

desA

[edited by Russ_Watters]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #102
A gun ban in this country would in all likelyhood cost many many lives. This is a sacred cow that best not be touched. Those proposing such a ban are tantamount to gluttons. The carnage yesterday was not enough for them ... they want more of the same, but on a greater scale, for it don't take a rocket scientist to figure the ramifications of such a ban. You think everyone will turn their pop gun in? That's when the secret militia forms! Thats when it's open season on the politician. Will you feel safer then?
 
  • #103
And those from other countries need to understand that the entire basis of this country is that our founders didn't like the way government ran where they came from and wanted something different, and those of us who choose to continue to live here do value our freedoms above all else. We don't want to be just like you. You are as free as your government allows you to be in choosing how your country is run and to demand whatever laws you want to have where you are. Likewise, do NOT tell us what laws we should or shouldn't have or what rights we should or shouldn't have in our own country. It is not selfishness to hold individual rights in the highest regard; it is the best way we know to protect the society as a whole from dictators who would trample the basic rights that are the basis of human dignity.
Hate to burst your Bubble, but it IS selfish to think of only ME ME ME ME. MY individual freedoms, MY right to carry weapons, MY right to do this that and the other thing...
Again the *dictators* nonsense, America being taken over by a Dictator. Just look at your recent (last 100 years) History to see how absurd that sounds.
Your gun laws perhaps would have stopped that happening a few hundred years ago, but not now. Plus the chance of that happening are between 0 and nill and nill just left town.
 
  • #104
Hate to burst your Bubble, but it IS selfish to think of only ME ME ME ME. MY individual freedoms
I resemble that remark. This is the example of a true patriot. You should be so proud. What do you propose ... Mein Kampf?
 
Last edited:
  • #105
mattmns said:
Wow that is crazy! Why did no one attempt to take down the gunman? I can't say exactly what I would do in the situation, since I was not in it, but I would probably try to take the guy down. Why not? If I die, well then I don't have to worry about school :smile: and if I am successful then I am a hero :smile:

If you consider airplane evacuations as a somewhat similar event, the natural response is shock and disbelief that the event's actually happened. Most passengers typically remain seated until either the flight attendents give them guidance or other passengers start evacuating.

Even after a person starts moving, their thought process still jumps back and forth between irrelevant 'normal' options and more relevant response to the crisis at hand. In fact, about half of passengers try to take their carry-on baggage with them during real emergency evacuations.

Both situations are similar in that the people involved have had virtually no training. Airline passengers get the pre-flight safety briefing, but almost no one listens. Fortunately, people sitting in an exit row are more likely to listen to the safety briefing and read the safety card. Almost half of the people sitting in the exit row have at least some clue how the exit should open. Fewer know when to open the exit (in a couple cases a passenger opened or attempted to open an emergency exit when flames were present outside the exit - in one case, passengers actually evacuated through flames with several receiving severe burns).

I think you can virtually guarantee none of the students had ever received a briefing on what to do if a gunman suddenly entered the room and started firing. Recovering their senses quickly enough to jump out of a window is a pretty exceptional response in that situation. Enough students recovering their senses and coming up with a group plan is just unrealistic.

However, in emergency evacuations from planes, every once in a while a person does take some responsibility for themselves and the group and act quite heroically to help speed up the evacuation. You might get someone like that in a mad gunman scenario, but having even one person react that way would be pretty exceptional.

http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2000/SS0001.pdf

Not particularly scientific, but a pretty riveting article by one of the survivors of Flight 1420 in Little Rock. Their plane slid off the runway and down an embankment and caught fire. Passengers evacuated the plane in total darkness (the emergency lighting didn't work) into a swampy field in the middle of a hail storm. Since they slid off the runway, controllers weren't expecting an emergency landing. It took 45 minutes for emergency personnel to respond. AA Flight 1420
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #106
I resemble that remark. This is the example of a true patriot. You should be so proud.
Welcome, this makes me happy someone who sees a spade for a spade and accepts what he/she is.
What do you propose ... Mein Kampf?
Are you calling me a Nazi? The Nazi's were all for individual freedoms for the elite without any care for society as a whole. Kettle pot black. Is this board a true representation of people from the USA? Because you really do have a very paranoid fear of Dictators taking your country, perhaps the Neo-con's had a point :wink:
 
Last edited:
  • #107
Anttech said:
Welcome, this makes me happy someone who sees a spade for a spade and accepts what he/she is.

I have no problem with who I am. There are some things worth dieing for. Your individual freedom is one of them. That also means killing for the sake of it. WWII was an expression of it.
 
  • #108
Expression of what?

ohh wait you mean we weren't fighting for each other

*we will fight them on the beaches, we will never surrender*

we were in fact fight for our selfish wants
 
  • #109
Expression of what?

You just don't get it do you?
 
  • #110
Castlegate said:
You just don't get it do you?

He (she?) really doesn't.
 
  • #111
Castlegate said:
You just don't get it do you?
I do, but I don't agree with it. Cant you accept that?

I don't believe individual freedoms LIKE owning Guns are a right we NEED to have in the 21st century. It seems to me you just don't get it. You not being allowed to have them is NOT an encroachment of your freedom. My grandfathers did not die in WW2 for people to own guns. They died for our freedom from far right facism, our being allowed to express ourself (like this bulletin Board). Our not being sent to death camps for what we believe in. MY grandfathers did not die for us to be allowed to carry weapons that harm society.

Its you that doesn't get it, if you think that not owning a Gun is going to make you less free.
 
Last edited:
  • #112
Anttech said:
You not being allowed to have them is NOT an encroachment of your freedom.

Yes, it is.
 
  • #113
Anttech said:
I do, but I don't agree with it. Cant you accept that?

I don't believe individual freedoms LIKE owning Guns are a right we NEED to have in the 21st century. It seems to me you just don't get it. You not being allowed to have them is NOT an encroachment of your freedom.

Well here in the US the right to bare arms is a constitutional right, and I'm a 100% certain that a majority of US citizens still support that right. Any attempt by legislatures to ban weapons at this time would be considered an encroachment on that very freedoms we hold so dearly. This would not be a time to drop your weapons, but a time to bare arms. This in itself is worth dieing for. Get it?
 
  • #114
Is it an encroachment of your freedom if I tell you, you arent allowed to shoot me?
 
  • #115
Castlegate said:
Well here in the US the right to bare arms is a constitutional right, and I'm a 100% certain that a majority of US citizens still support that right. Any attempt by legislatures to ban weapons at this time would be considered an encroachment on that very freedoms we hold so dearly. This would not be a time to drop your weapons, but a time to bare arms. This in itself is worth dieing for. Get it?
I always got it. You are singing to the choir, it seems to me you haven't even bothered to read ANY of my posts on this issue..
 
  • #116
This has gotten out of hand.

Far worse incidents have happened outside the US.

"More than 200 people are dead and hundreds more are injured after special forces battle militants who had taken hostages at a Russian school. A group of mostly Chechen gunmen had been holding an estimated 1,000 or more captives, far more than official estimates of 450 hostages."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=3888681
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K