Virial Theorem for an expanding Star Cluster

  • Thread starter Thread starter Barbequeman
  • Start date Start date
Barbequeman
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Good morning

I have a certain problem to find the answer to a problem with a question for my "homework" it contains the virial theorem for an unrotating and in the equilibrium state star cluster which is not contracting, instead it is expanding. therefore we need to calculate the kinetic energy of the stars in this system and the total energy of this system. I know we need to use the simplest form of the virial theorem 2K+U=0 because it is unrotating and in equilibrium.

We now have the radius of a sphere of finite radius and density r_c, the mass of the gas which is M_g which is given by M_g = f*M_star where M_star is the total mass of the stars in the cluster. My problem is now to plug it into make sense out of it ... I resolved everything in our course notes but there it seems I´m pretty much stuck ... We are therefore looking for the kinetic energy of the system in terms of r_c, f and M_star and the total energy of the system.

It would be very nice to get some help in this case ... because I cannot see the answer.

Best wishes

BBQman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Barbequeman said:
Good morning

I have a certain problem to find the answer to a problem with a question for my "homework" it contains the virial theorem for an unrotating and in the equilibrium state star cluster which is not contracting, instead it is expanding. therefore we need to calculate the kinetic energy of the stars in this system and the total energy of this system. I know we need to use the simplest form of the virial theorem 2K+U=0 because it is unrotating and in equilibrium.

We now have the radius of a sphere of finite radius and density r_c, the mass of the gas which is M_g which is given by M_g = f*M_star where M_star is the total mass of the stars in the cluster. My problem is now to plug it into make sense out of it ... I resolved everything in our course notes but there it seems I´m pretty much stuck ... We are therefore looking for the kinetic energy of the system in terms of r_c, f and M_star and the total energy of the system.

It would be very nice to get some help in this case ... because I cannot see the answer.

Best wishes

BBQman
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Please post your schoolwork problem in the Homework Help, Introductory Physics forum. Please fill out the sections for the Problem Statement and Relevant Equations, and then show your work toward a solution. It also helps if you can post your math using LaTeX (see the "LaTeX Guide" link below the Edit window. If your terms and equations are simple enough in this problem, you may be able to just use standard text formatting. But as your math posts get more advanced in future threads, please learn basic LaTeX to make them easier to read and quote.

Enjoy PF! :smile:
 
Hello everyone, I was advised to join this community while seeking guidance on how to navigate the academic world as an independent researcher. My name is Omar, and I'm based in Groningen The Netherlands. My formal physics education ended after high school, but I have dedicated the last several years to developing a theoretical framework from first principles. My work focuses on a topological field theory (which I call Swirl-String Theory) that models particles as knotted vortex...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top