Visualizing Subspaces and Subsets (in R3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaxMackie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subsets Subspaces
Click For Summary
Vector spaces and their subspaces are key concepts in linear algebra, with subspaces being specific subsets that meet certain criteria. Visualizing these concepts can be enhanced through problem-solving and practical examples. An egg analogy is used to illustrate that the whole egg could represent a vector space, while the yolk sack might be viewed as a subspace, depending on the context. In Euclidean space R3, vector spaces are characterized by flatness, and the only valid subspaces are lines and planes that pass through the origin (0,0,0). Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the structure and properties of vector spaces and their subspaces.
MaxMackie
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have trouble visualizing what exactly these are. Vector Space, Subset, Sub Space...
What's the difference and how can I "see" it. I'm a very visual person.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space#Definition"

Vector Spaces and their Subspaces are studied in Linear Algebra, while Subsets are a much more general formulation (subspaces are subsets of appropriate vector spaces with certain properties). You visualize these things concepts by doing lots of problems on them.

Here are some more links:
http://home.scarlet.be/~ping1339/Pvect.htm
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~toida/nerzic/content/set/basics.html
http://library.thinkquest.org/C0126820/setsubset.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks, I've read those over a couple times before and I get the math of it. But, let's say and egg.

Are any of these statements true about the egg?
-The eggs as a whole is a Vector Space and the yolk sack is a Subspace?
-If there was something else within the yolk, we could say that the yolk sack is a Vector Space and the thing inside is a Subspace.

Sorry to use an egg as an example, it just seems to fit.
Thanks!
 
In Euclidean space, Rn, with addition and scalar multiplication defined "componentwise" ((x, y, z)+ (u, v, w)= (x+u,y+ v, z+ w) and r(x, y, z)= (rx, ry, rz)) vector spaces are flat. The sphere, [math]x^2+ y^2+ z^2= R^2[/math], for example, is not a vector space because (1, 0, 0) is in that set but 2(1,0,0)= (2,0,0) is not.

The only subspaces of R3 are planes containing (0,0,0) and lines containing (0,0,0).

(Lines and planes that do NOT contain (0,0,0) are often referred to as "linear manifolds".)
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K