Volunteers for an Experimental Teaching Tool

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the development of an open source, modular, web-based teaching tool aimed at enhancing math, science, and engineering education. Participants explore the need for such a tool, the collaborative approach to its creation, and the potential challenges and inspirations for its design.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • David introduces a project to create a collaborative teaching tool and seeks volunteers for expertise.
  • One participant questions the necessity of new software, asking about the effectiveness of existing content management systems like Zope and Joomla, as well as popular content delivery platforms like YouTube and Vimeo.
  • Another participant argues that collaboration among experts from various fields is essential for developing an effective teaching tool, as content experts alone may lack skills in teaching methodologies, web design, and user engagement.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that a singular visionary is needed for the project, rather than a multitude of contributors, to avoid fragmentation in the design process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the necessity and approach to developing the teaching tool. There is no consensus on whether existing software solutions are sufficient or if a new collaborative tool is needed.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the effectiveness of current teaching tools and the roles of various experts in the development process remain unexamined. The discussion does not resolve the potential benefits or drawbacks of a collaborative versus a singular visionary approach.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in educational technology, collaborative software development, and innovative teaching methodologies may find this discussion relevant.

daviddoria
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I am starting a project to develop, with a very diverse team, an open source, modular, web-based teaching tool for math, science, and engineering courses.

Here is a link to the full project description:
http://www.rpi.edu/~doriad/TeachingTool/Multidisciplinary_Teaching_Software_Project_6-2-2010.doc

Since the project is not yet funded, we are looking for people who believe in the cause and are willing to provide their expertise to get us started. Of course if things go well, there may be funding in the future!

Please let me know if you are interested! Please PM me.

Thanks!

David
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
David, I removed your e-mail address because spam bots will pick it up and you will be inundated. People can PM you, then you can decide if they are someone you really want to give your address to. Likewise, you are more likely to get PM'd than e-mailed, no one here knows who you are.
 
why is new software needed? What's is wrong with conventional CMS like zope and joomla? or more popular content delivery services like youtube or vimeo?
 
You're right - the software may be fine. What I'm claiming though is that there needs to be many people from many fields working together to effectively produce a teaching tool. Typically this is done by the "content expert" alone. He is typically not versed in the "art" of teaching, or learning, or web design, or speaking/lecture, or human factors considerations, etc. I am wondering what it would be like to have a group of experts from each of these fields work together to produce a tool.
 
I see. Well you should want to do totally different things to what you can imagine.

Look at James Burke KnowledgeWeb for inspiration. Forget the rote top down learning approach. You also need a visionary- not lots of cooks pulling on the design fracturing it into pieces.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
16K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K