MHB Wackerly/Mendenhall/Schaeffer Problem 2.19: Assignment of Probabilities

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the assignment of probabilities related to family incomes exceeding the 1991 median of $35,353. The sample space for three surveyed families includes eight combinations of income levels. The calculated probabilities for events A (at least two families exceeding the median), B (exactly two exceeding), and C (exactly one below) are based on equal likelihood, resulting in P(A) = 1/2, P(B) = 3/8, and P(C) = 1/8. However, the book provides different probabilities, suggesting a possible error in their calculations or a different method of assigning probabilities. The conversation concludes with a consensus that the initial calculations appear correct, indicating a potential discrepancy in the book's answers.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
The Bureau of the Census reports that the median family income for all families in the United States during the year $1991$ was $\$35,353$. That is, half of all American families had incomes exceeding this amount and half had incomes equal to or below this amount (Wright 1992, p. 242). Suppose that three families are surveyed and that each one reveals whether their income exceeded $\$35,353$ in $1991$.

  • List the points in the sample space.
  • Identify the simple events in each of the following events:
    • At least two had incomes exceeding $\$35,353$.
    • Exactly two had incomes exceeding $\$35,353$.
    • Exactly one had income less than or equal to $\$35,353$.
  • Make use of the given information for the median to assign probabilities to the simple events and find $P(A), P(B),$ and $P(C)$.

Answer

  1. Let $E$ mean a family's income exceeds the median, and $B$ mean a family's income was below the median. Then the sample space consists of eight entries: $EEE, EEB, EBE, EBB, BEE, BEB, BBE, BBB$.
  2. We have that \begin{align*} A&=\{EEE, EEB, EBE, BEE\} \\ B&=\{EEB, EBE, BEE\} \\ C&=B. \end{align*}
  3. The probability of each simple event is equal, so $1/8$. $P(A)=1/2$, and $P(B)=P(C)=3/8$.

The problem is that the book's answer is $P(A)=11/16, P(B)=3/8,$ and $P(C)=1/4$. I'm thinking the book assigned different probabilities to the simple events. Why did the book do that? What would be the justification for doing so?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Ackbach,

Your answers look right to me. So maybe there is an error in the book.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
15K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K