MHB Wackerly/Mendenhall/Schaeffer Problem 2.19: Assignment of Probabilities

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the assignment of probabilities related to family incomes exceeding the 1991 median of $35,353. The sample space for three surveyed families includes eight combinations of income levels. The calculated probabilities for events A (at least two families exceeding the median), B (exactly two exceeding), and C (exactly one below) are based on equal likelihood, resulting in P(A) = 1/2, P(B) = 3/8, and P(C) = 1/8. However, the book provides different probabilities, suggesting a possible error in their calculations or a different method of assigning probabilities. The conversation concludes with a consensus that the initial calculations appear correct, indicating a potential discrepancy in the book's answers.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
93
The Bureau of the Census reports that the median family income for all families in the United States during the year $1991$ was $\$35,353$. That is, half of all American families had incomes exceeding this amount and half had incomes equal to or below this amount (Wright 1992, p. 242). Suppose that three families are surveyed and that each one reveals whether their income exceeded $\$35,353$ in $1991$.

  • List the points in the sample space.
  • Identify the simple events in each of the following events:
    • At least two had incomes exceeding $\$35,353$.
    • Exactly two had incomes exceeding $\$35,353$.
    • Exactly one had income less than or equal to $\$35,353$.
  • Make use of the given information for the median to assign probabilities to the simple events and find $P(A), P(B),$ and $P(C)$.

Answer

  1. Let $E$ mean a family's income exceeds the median, and $B$ mean a family's income was below the median. Then the sample space consists of eight entries: $EEE, EEB, EBE, EBB, BEE, BEB, BBE, BBB$.
  2. We have that \begin{align*} A&=\{EEE, EEB, EBE, BEE\} \\ B&=\{EEB, EBE, BEE\} \\ C&=B. \end{align*}
  3. The probability of each simple event is equal, so $1/8$. $P(A)=1/2$, and $P(B)=P(C)=3/8$.

The problem is that the book's answer is $P(A)=11/16, P(B)=3/8,$ and $P(C)=1/4$. I'm thinking the book assigned different probabilities to the simple events. Why did the book do that? What would be the justification for doing so?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Ackbach,

Your answers look right to me. So maybe there is an error in the book.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top