In QED, the Ward identities set [tex] Z_1=Z_2 [/tex] and [tex] Z_1 - 1 = \left. {\frac{{d\Sigma \left( p \right)}}{{dp}}} \right|_{p = m} [/tex]. This can be shown explicitly for the 1-loop calculations if one uses an on-shell subtraction scheme, where the renormalized mass and charge are identical to the experimentally measured ones. What happens if one uses instead a subtraction scheme like MS or [tex] \overline {MS} [/tex]? Arguably the Ward identities should hold again, but in calculating the various Z functions, one finds that [tex] Z_1 - 1 = \left. {\frac{{d\Sigma \left( p \right)}}{{dp}}} \right|_{p = m} [/tex] only holds at the level of the infinite contributions (poles), while there are some finite differences. Is that supposed to happen? Do the identities only refer to the infinite parts of the renormalization functions?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Ward identities in Minimal Subtraction Scheme

Loading...

Similar Threads for Ward identities Minimal |
---|

I Superposition of particle identities |

B Questions about Identical Particles |

A Time independence of a Noether charge in QFT? |

A Identical and indistinguishable particles |

A Operator identity |

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**